No abstract

Vole population sex ratio varies seasonally. However, population sex ratios have usually been estimated using naïve estimators that do not allow for biases owing to the sex difference in capture probabilities and movement distances (i.e., effective areas sampled). Here we aimed to advance the methodological approach, recognizing that there are two different classes of contributing mechanisms to the pattern which are best addressed separately: (1) those mechan isms imposing a systematic error (bias) in population estimates and (2) those generating the true process variation. Analyzing 7-year capture–recapture data in the common vole (Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778)), we quantified both types of biases and revealed that the bias owing to differential capture rates was often severe and less predictable, whereas that owing to differential effective areas was smaller and overestimated male numbers for most of the year. We demonstrated unambiguously that the unbiased population sex ratio indeed varies seasonally, with the males usually being more numerous over winter and spring. By testing predictions from two mechanistic hypotheses to explain the process variability, we found evidence for both the differential recruitment hypothesis and the differential survival hypothesis. From April–May to August, it was the females that were recruited more to the population and that had higher survival rates than males. We suggest that the seasonal variation in the population sex ratio is not merely a result of biasing mechanisms but an important population property driven by the joint effect of differential recruitment and differential survival between sexes.

In prey communities with shared predators, variation in prey vulnerability is a key factor in shaping community dynamics. Conversely, the hunting efficiency of a predator depends on the prey community structure, preferences of the predator and antipredatory behavioural traits of the prey. We studied experimentally, under seminatural field conditions, the preferences of a predator and the antipredatory responses of prey in a system consisting of two Myodes species of voles, the grey‐sided vole (M. rufocanus Sund.) and the bank vole (M. glareolus Schreb.), and their specialist predator, the least weasel (Mustela nivalis nivalis L.). To quantify the preference of the weasels, we developed a new modelling framework that can be used for unbalanced data. The two vole species were hypothesised to have different habitat‐dependent vulnerabilities. We created two habitats, open and forest, to provide different escape possibilities for the voles. We found a weak general preference of the weasels for the grey‐sided voles over the bank voles, and a somewhat stronger preference specifically in open habitats. The weasels clearly preferred male grey‐sided voles over females, whereas in bank voles, there was no difference. The activity of voles changed over time, so that voles increased their movements immediately after weasel introduction, but later adjusted their movements to times of lowered predation risk. Females that were more active had an elevated mortality risk, whereas in the case of males, the result was the opposite. We conclude that, in vulnerability to predation, the species‐ or habitat‐specific characteristics of these prey species are playing a minor role compared to sex‐specific characteristics.

No abstract

No abstract