While it has been known for some time that the c-Myc protein binds to random DNA sequences, no sequence-specific binding activity has been detected. At its carboxyl terminus, c-Myc contains a basic—helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif, which is important for dimerization and specific DNA binding, as demonstrated for other bHLH protein family members. Of those studied, most bHLH proteins bind to sites that contain a CA- -TG consensus. In this study, the technique of selected and amplified binding-sequence (SAAB) imprinting was used to identify a DNA sequence that was recognized by c-Myc. A purified carboxyl-terminal fragment of human c-Myc that contained the bHLH domain bound in vitro in a sequence-specific manner to the sequence, CACGTG. These results suggest that some of the biological functions of Myc family proteins are accomplished by sequence-specific DNA binding that is mediated by the carboxyl-terminal region of the protein.

No abstract

The Myc family proteins are thought to be involved in transcription because they have both a carboxy-terminal basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper (bHLH-Z) domain, common to a large class of transcription factors, and an amino-terminal fragment which, for c-Myc, has transactivating function when assayed in chimaeric constructs. In addition, c-, N- and L-Myc proteins heterodimerize, in vitro and in vivo, with the bHLH-Z protein Max. In vitro, Max homodimerizes but preferentially associates with Myc, which homodimerizes poorly. Furthermore Myc-Max heterodimers specifically bind the nucleotide sequence CACGTG with higher affinity than either homodimer alone. The identification of Max and the specific DNA-binding activities of Myc and Max provides an opportunity for directly testing the transcriptional activities of these proteins in mammalian cells. We report here that Myc overexpression activates, whereas Max overexpression represses, transcription of a reporter gene. Max-induced repression is relieved by overexpression of c-Myc. Repression requires the DNA-binding domain of Max, whereas relief of repression requires the dimerization and transcriptional activation activities of Myc. Both effects require Myc-Max-binding sites in the reporter gene.

Using an in vitro binding-site selection assay, we have demonstrated that c-Myc-Max complexes bind not only to canonical CACGTG or CATGTG motifs that are flanked by variable sequences but also to noncanonical sites that consist of an internal CG or TG dinucleotide in the context of particular variations in the CA--TG consensus. None of the selected sites contain an internal TA dinucleotide, suggesting that Myc proteins necessarily bind asymmetrically in the context of a CAT half-site. The noncanonical sites can all be bound by proteins of the Myc-Max family but not necessarily by the related CACGTG-and CATGTG-binding proteins USF and TFE3. Substitution of an arginine that is conserved in these proteins into MyoD (MyoD-R) changes its binding specificity so that it recognizes CACITG instead of the MyoD cognate sequence (CAGCTG).However, like USF and TFE3, MyoD-R does not bind to all of the noncanonical c-Myc-Max sites. Although this R substitution changes the internal dinucleotide specificity of MyoD, it does not significantly alter its wild-type binding sequence preferences at positions outside of the CA--TG motif, suggesting that it does not dramatically change other important amino acid-DNA contacts; this observation has important implications for models of basic-helix-loop-helix protein-DNA binding.Members of the Myc family of proteins (c-, N-, and L-Myc) have been implicated in oncogenesis, in progression through the cell cycle (39), and in induction of apoptosis (25, 45); however, the direct targets of their activity remain unknown. Myc proteins are members (21) of the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein family (42), in which the HLH domain is responsible for dimerization (42, 43) and the adjacent basic region mediates sequence-specific DNA binding (20, 56). They belong to a bHLH protein subgroup (bHLH-LZ proteins) in which a leucine zipper motif (37) that is located immediately C terminal to the HLH domain seems to participate in the dimerization process (7,26,31,40

We analyzed the effects of suppressor mutations in the U1 snRNA (SNR19) gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the splicing of mutant pre‐mRNA substrates. The results indicate that pairing between U1 snRNA and the highly conserved position 5 (GTATGT) of the intron occurs early in spliceosome assembly in vitro. This pairing is important for efficient splicing both in vitro and in vivo. However, pairing at position 5 does not appear to influence 5′ splice site selection in vivo, indicating that the previously described U1 snRNA:5′ splice junction base pairing interaction is not sufficient to define the 5′ cleavage site.