3661Registry No. [Et4N]z[Moz0z(4-MeC6H4s)6(oMe)], 69532-73-6; [Et4N]z[Mozoz(sPh),(oMe)l, 69609-04-7; MoOCldthf)z, 20529-ment, and it may be that, once the first bridging ligand is displaced, subsequent attack on the remaining positions is more radd. 42-4; benzoyl chloride, 98-88-4. Supplementary Material Available: Listings of calculated atomic coordinates, anisotropic thermal parameters, isotropic thermal parameters, bond lengths, bond angles, and observed and calculated structure factors (49 pages). Ordering information is given on any Achow'edgment* We thank the SERC and Verband der ChemiSchen InduStrie for financial Support and Professor J. H. Enemark and Dr. M. R. Minelli for measuring the 9 5 M~ current masthead-page.--NMR spectra.Contribution from the Crystal structures have been resolved at room temperature for a series of Cu(I1) complexes with cyclic tetrathia ether ligands having the general formulation Cu"( [n]aneS4)(C104)z(Hz0),, where n represents the total number of carbon and sulfur atoms in the macrocyclic ligand ring (n = 12, 13, 15, 16) and x = 1 for n = 12 or 13 and zero for the other compounds.The respective space groups, lattice constants, and final R factors for these four compounds are'as follows: for orthorhombic
C~~~([12]aneS~)(ClO~)~(H~0)space group PbcZ,, a = 9.010 (2) A, b = 15.775 (3) A, c = 13.380 (2) A, Z = 4, R = 0.127, R, = 0.162; for monoclinic C~~~([l3]aneS~)(ClO~)~(H~0) space group a = 18.073 (3) A, b = 13.607 (3) A, c = 18.167 (3) A, 6 = 119.759 (l)', Z = 8, R = 0.081, R, = 0.116; for monoclinic C~" ( [ l 5 ] a n e S~) ( C 1 0~)~ space group P2,/n, a = 7.994 (1) A, b = 9.167 (3) A, c = 13.978 (3) A, @ = 99.29 (3)O, Z = 2, R = 0.066, R, = 0.085; for monoclinic C~" ( [ 1 6 ] a n e S~) ( C l O~)~ space group P2,/c, a = 7.931 (3) A, b = 9.613 (5) A, c = 14.885 (5) A, 6 = 110.71 (3)O, Z = 2, R = 0.044, R, = 0.064. These structures are compared with that previously reported for C~~~( [ l 4 ] a n e S~) ( C l O , )~to provide a continuous series of homologous macrocyclic complexes in which the internal cavity progresses from dimensions that are too small to accommodate the central metal ion to those that exceed optimal size. In the compounds formed with[12]aneS4 and [13]aneS4, the Cu(I1) ion sits 0.53 and 0.38 A above the plane of the four sulfur donor atoms. In both cases the inner coordination sphere is square pyramidal, being completed by an axially coordinated water molecule. In the complexes formed with the three larger ligands, Cu(I1) is coplanar with the four sulfur donor atoms, and two C104-ions are coordinated axially to form a tetragonal inner coordination sphere. The Cu-S bond lengths increase with increasing ring size, exhibiting average values of 2.30, 2.32, and 2.36 A for n = 14, 15, and 16, respectively. In the last complex, in fact, the four Cu-S bonds are no longer equivalent: one pair of trans-Cu-S bonds is 2.33 A while the other pair is 2.39 A. In all five complexes, the axial C u -0 bond distances vary inversely with the average Cu-S bond distances so that, wi...