The recently described VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is caused by somatic mutations in UBA1. Patients with VEXAS display late-onset autoinflammatory symptoms, usually refractory to treatment, and hematologic abnormalities. The identification of an easily-accessible specific marker (UBA1 mutations) is of particular interest as it allows the convergence of various inflammatory and hematological symptoms in a unique clinico-biological entity and gives the opportunity to design specific treatment strategies. Here we retrospectively identified 6 patients with VEXAS who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). To date, no treatment guidelines have been validated. In four patients, ASCT was guided by life-threatening autoinflammatory symptoms that were refractory to multiple therapies. Three patients are in durable complete remission, 32, 38 and 37 months after ASCT. Two others are in complete remission response after 3 and 5 months. One unfortunately died post-ASCT. This report suggests that ASCT could be a curative option in patients with VEXAS and severe manifestations. Considering the complications and side effects of the procedure as well as the existence of other potential treatment, clinical trials are needed to define the subgroup of patients who will benefit from this strategy and its place in the therapeutic arsenal against VEXAS.

Imatinib is a promising candidate for the treatment of fibrotic diseases. This retrospective study evaluated the use of imatinib for the treatment of refractory sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease in 14 patients with different hematologic malignancies. Imatinib was started at a median of 44 months after transplantation (range, 16-119 months after transplantation) and was administered for a median of 5.9 months from time of initiation (range, 2.1-74 months from time of initiation). With a median overall follow-up of 11.6 months from time of initiation (range, 4.1-74 months from time of initiation) of imatinib, 4 patients (29%) had to stop imatinib because of drug intolerance. All other adverse reactions were of mild-tomoderate grade and could be managed symptomatically. Overall, 7 patients responded to imatinib (50%; 95% confidence interval, 24%-76%) with 4 patients improving their Rodman score more than or equal to 90%. In addition, imatinib therapy allowed for a significant reduction of corticosteroid dosage. Despite its limited size, this cohort suggests some beneficial activity of imatinib in sclerotic chronic graft-versus-host disease, warranting further prospective investigations. (Blood. 2009

Thirty patients, with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 20) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n = 10), were enrolled in a phase II trial entailing prophylactic post-transplant azacitidine (AZA) plus escalated doses of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The median number of AZA cycles was 5 (1-12) with 10 patients (33%) completing the 12 projected cycles. DLI were performed in 17 patients: 5 received one DLI, 2 received 2 DLI and 8 received 3 infusions. AZA was well tolerated, but discontinued in 20 patients primarily due to graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade 1-3 acute GvHD was 31.5% and the chronic GvHD CI was 53% at 2 years. At a median follow-up of 49 months (27-63), 18 patients are alive. The overall and disease-free survivals are 65.5% (CI 95% = 48.2-82.8) at 2 years. Cause of death was mainly relapse for 9 patients. The median time to relapse was 7 months (2.5-58) and the cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 27.6% (CI 95% = 12.8-44.6). These results confirm that AZA is well tolerated as a prophylactic treatment to reduce the risk of post-transplantation relapse and compared favorably to those of patients who receive no post-transplant maintenance.