No abstract

Doppler ultrasound has been extensively used in detecting reno-vascular diseases, showing to be a noninvasive, safe, low cost and repeatable tool. The Renal Resistive Index (RRI) [(peak systolic velocity -end diastolic velocity)/peak systolic velocity] is a semi-quantitative index derived by Doppler evaluation of renal vascular bed. Normally RRI is in the range of 0.47-0.70, it increases with aging and, usually, it shows a difference between the two kidneys less than 5-8 %. RRI is an important prognostic marker in chronic kidney diseases (CKD), both in diabetic and non-diabetic kidney diseases, because, in longitudinal prospective studies, it significantly correlated with hemodynamic (ABPM, SBP, DBP, pulse pressure) and histopathological parameters (glomerular sclerosis, arteriolosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, interstitial infiltration). In acute kidney injury (AKI) RI is a valid tool in differentiating between pre-renal and renal failure and in predicting renal response to vasoactive agents. In addition a RRI[0.74 can predict the onset of AKI in septic patients. Renal Resistive Index is a useful marker in allograft diseases because it has been widely showed a correlation with histological lesions during worsening of renal function, both in acute rejection and in chronic allograft nephropathy. Recent studies suggest its role in the risk of new onset diabetes after transplantation and it could be one of the parameters to evaluate to shift or withdrawal immunological and/or hypertensive therapy.Keywords Renal resistive index Á Diabetic nephropathy Á Acute kidney injury Á Renal transplantation Á Chronic kidney diseaseRiassunto La Metodica Color Doppler è stata diffusamente utilizzata per evidenziare patologie nefrovascolari in relazione alle caratteristiche di non invasività, sicurezza, basso costo e ripetibilità della stessa. L'indice di resistenza renale (RRI) [(Picco di velocità sistolica -Velocità telediastolica)/ Picco di velocità sistolica] è un indice semiquantitativo derivato dalla valutazione Doppler del letto vascolare renale. Normalmente il valore del RRI è nel range di 0,47-0,70, aumentando con l'età, e usualmente, è presente una differenza tra i due reni inferiore al 5-8%. RRI è un importante marker prognostico nelle patologie renali croniche (CKD), sia diabetiche che non-diabetiche, poichè, in studi prospettici longitudinali, esso correla significativamente con parametri emodinamici (ABPM, Pressione Sistolica, pressione Diastolica, Pressione di Polso) e istopatologici (glomerulosclerosi, arteriolosclerosi, fibrosi interstiziale/ atrofia tubulare e infiltrato interstiziale). Nel Danno Renale Acuto (AKI) RI è un valido strumento nel distinguere l'insufficienza acuta pre-renale da quella renale e nel predire la risposta renale agli agenti vasoattivi. Inoltre un valore di RRI [0,74 può predire la comparsa di AKI nei pazienti affetti da sepsi. RRI è un marker utile nelle patologie del rene trapiantato, perchè è stata ampiamente dimostrata una correlazione con lesioni istologiche...

Diabetes and obesity are already recognized as potential risk factors for nephrolithiasis, especially for uric acid stones. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia actively contribute to impaired ability to excrete an acid load and altered ammonium production, leading to a lower urinary pH compared to non-diabetic controls. All these electrolytic disorders play an important role in stone formation and aggregation, especially in uric acid stones. There are still missing points in scientific evidence if the increased risk in stone formation is already existing even in the prediabetic statuses (isolated impaired glucose tolerance, isolated impaired fasting glucose, and associated impaired glucose tolerance/impaired fasting glucose) as well as it is worth to consider the same level of risk. Urolithiasis is the most frequent urological cause of hospitalization in diabetic patients and its cost is usually higher compared to non-diabetic patients, but less is known in others altered glycaemic diseases. The aim of this review article is to focus on the association between stone formation and altered glycaemic statuses, beyond the already known link between nephrolithiasis and diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes is a complex disease of increasingly common occurrence worldwide. Attaining optimal glycemic control is the main challenge to prevent the development of diabetes-related complications and/or to stop their progression. In recent years, the pharmacologic toolkit for the treatment of diabetes has considerably expanded, thus paving the way to more pathophysiology-oriented therapies. For instance, the sodium-glucose cotransporters SGLT2 and SGLT1 have been in the spotlight because of better knowledge of their physiology and therapeutic potential. At present, whereas the SGLT2 inhibitors are widely applied in current clinical practice as an effective and well-tolerated treatment that increases the urinary excretion of glucose, less is known about the use of SGLT1 inhibitors. SGLT1s are of primary importance in the small intestine, an organ that does not express SGLT2, while in the kidney they are expressed in the late renal proximal tubules, where it reabsorbs the glucose escaped from the upstream SGLT2. Hence, SGLT1-mediated glucose reabsorption in the kidney is increased when the tubular glucose load overwhelms the capacity of SGLT2 or when the latter is inhibited. The role of SGLT1 in intestinal and renal glucose transport makes the transporter a potential target for antidiabetic therapy. Here, we briefly report the evidence on LX2761, a new inhibitor against SGLT1 and SGLT2 in vitro, which acts in vivo as a selective inhibitor of SGLT1 in the gastrointestinal tract. LX2761 improves glycemic control without the glycosuria-related side effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, particularly genitourinary tract infections. However, whether it represents a valid therapeutic option for all patients with diabetes or is more appropriate for specific phenotypes, e.g., patients with concomitant diabetes and chronic kidney disease, who may benefit less from the renal mechanism of selective SGLT2 inhibitors, remains to be tested in large randomized controlled trials.

Type II mixed cryoglobulinemia without evidence of HCV infection but rather with renal involvement has been occasionally described. The pathogenesis of cryoglobulinemic kidney disease is most likely related to immune complex deposition including cryoglobulins, and cryoaggregation after cold exposure could play a pivotal role in clinical expression of cryoglobulinemia. In these cases, acute kidney injury and proteinuria remain the most frequent clinical expression of a cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis. Type II cryoglobulinemia with the laboratory finding of both monoclonal and polyclonal cryoglobulins is the most prevalent bio-humoral pattern among HCV-negative phenotypes with renal involvement, while type III cryoglobulinemia with polyclonal Ig is rare. Histological data in renal biopsies support the hypothesis that regardless of the HCV status cryoglobulinemia vasculitis share the same frequent pathological finding of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritides, but other histological patterns have also been observed in a minority of cases. In HCV-negative mixed cryoglobulinaemia, the paraneoplastic origin of the immune dysfunction should be ruled out and sporadic cases have been reported, while there is no cumulative evidence on the prevalence of these tumour-associated manifestations. Moving from the classification criteria and the etiopathogenesis of mixed cryoglobulinaemia, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on the appearance of the disease with kidney injury in association with malignancies or autoimmune disorders without HCV coexistence.