Beam quality correction factors provided in current codes of practice for proton beams are approximated using the water-to-air mass stopping power ratio and by assuming the proton beam quality related perturbation correction factors to be unity. The aim of this work is to use Monte Carlo simulations to calculate energy dependent beam quality and perturbation correction factors for a set of nine ionization chambers in proton beams. Methods: The Monte Carlo code EGSnrc was used to determine the ratio of the absorbed dose to water and the absorbed dose to the sensitive air volume of ionization chambers f Q 0 related to the reference photon beam quality (60 Co). For proton beams, the quantity f Q was simulated with GATE/ Geant4 for five monoenergetic beam energies between 70 MeV and 250 MeV. The perturbation correction factors for the air cavity, chamber wall, chamber stem, central electrode, and displacement effect in proton radiation were investigated separately. Additionally, the correction factors of cylindrical chambers were investigated with and without consideration of the effective point of measurement. Results: The perturbation factors p Q were shown to deviate from unity for the investigated chambers, contradicting the assumptions made in dosimetry protocols. The beam quality correction factors for both plane-parallel and cylindrical chambers positioned with the effective point of measurement at the measurement depth were constant within 0.8%. An increase of the beam quality correction factors determined for cylindrical ionization chambers placed with their reference point at the measurement depth with decreasing energy is attributed to the displacement perturbation correction factors p dis , which were up to 1.045 AE 0.1% for the lowest energy and 1.005 AE 0.1% for the highest energy investigated. Besides p dis , the largest perturbation was found for the chamber wall where the smallest p wall determined was 0.981 AE 0.3%. Conclusions: Beam quality correction factors applied in dosimetry with cylindrical chambers in monoenergetic proton beams strongly depend on the positioning method used. We found perturbation correction factors different from unity. Consequently, the approximation of ionization chamber perturbations in proton beams by the respective water-to-air mass stopping power ratio shall be revised.

The introduction of advanced treatment techniques in proton therapy, such as intensitymodulated proton therapy, leads to an increased need for patient-specific quality assurance, especially an accurate treatment plan verification becomes inevitable. In this study, signal theoretical analysis of dose distributions in scanned proton therapy is performed to investigate the feasibility and limits of two-dimensional (2D) detector arrays for treatment plan verification. Methods: 2D detector arrays are characterized by two main aspects: the distance between the single detectors on the array or the sampling frequency; and the lateral response functions of a single detector. The analysis is based on single spots, reference fields and on measured and calculated dose distributions of typical intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans with and without range shifter. Measurements were performed with Gafchromic EBT3 films (Ashland Speciality Ingredients G.P., Bridgewater, NJ, USA), the MatriXX PT detector array (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) and the OCTAVIUS detector array 1500XDR (PTW-Freiburg, Germany) at an IBA Proteus PLUS proton therapy system (Ion Beam Applications, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Dose calculations were performed with the treatment planning system RayStation 6 or 8 (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden). Results: The Fourier analysis of the data of the treatment planning system and film measurements show maximum frequencies of 0.06/mm for the plan with range shifter and 0.083/mm for the plan without range shifter. According to the Nyquist theorem, this corresponds to minimum required sampling distances of 8.3 and 6 mm, respectively. By comparison, the sampling distances of the arrays of 7.6 mm (MatriXX PT) and 7.1 mm (OD1500XDR) are sufficient to reconstruct the dose distributions adequately from measurements if range shifters are used, whereas some fields of the plans without range shifter violated the Nyquist requirement. The lateral dose response functions of the single detectors within the arrays have clearly higher frequencies than the treatment plans and thus the volume effect only slightly influences the measurements. Consequently, the array measurements show high gamma passing rates with at least 96 % and a good agreement between the investigated line profiles. Conclusion: The results indicate that the detector dimensions and sampling distances of the arrays are in most studied cases adequate not to substantially influence the measurement process when they are used for analyzing typical intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans. Nevertheless, clinical conditions have been identified, for instance treatment plans without range shifter, under which the Nyquist theorem is violated such that a full representation of the dose distributions with the measurements is not feasible. In these cases, analysis of measurements is limited to pointwise comparisons.

Objective Point detector measurements in proton fields are perturbed by the volume effect originating from geometrical volume-averaging within the extended detector’s sensitive volume and density perturbations by non-water equivalent detector components. Detector specific lateral dose response functions K(x) can be used to characterize the volume effect within the framework of a mathematical convolution model, where K(x) is the convolution kernel transforming the true dose profile D(x) into the measured signal profile of a detector M(x). The aim of this work is to investigate K(x) for detectors in proton beams. Approach The K(x) for five detectors were determined by iterative deconvolution of measurements of D(x) and M(x) profiles at 2 cm water equivalent depth of a narrow 150 MeV proton beam. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out for two selected detectors to investigate a potential energy dependence, and to study the contribution of volume-averaging and density perturbation to the volume effect. Main results The Monte Carlo simulated and experimentally determined K(x) agree within 2.1% of the maximum value. Further simulations demonstrate that the main contribution to the volume effect is volume-averaging. The results indicate that an energy or depth dependence of K(x) is almost negligible in proton beams. While the signal reduction from a Semiflex 3D ionization chamber in the center of a gaussian shaped field with 2 mm sigma is 32% for photons, it is 15% for protons. When measuring the field with a microDiamond the trend is less pronounced and reversed with a signal reduction for protons of 3.9% and photons of 1.9%. Significance The determined K(x) can be applied to characterize the influence of the volume effect on detectors measured signal profiles at all clinical proton energies and measurement depths. The functions can be used to derive the actual dose distribution from point detector measurements.