A modern approach for brain metastases includes whole-brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous boost (WBRT+SIB). We developed a survival score in 128 patients treated with WBRT+SIB. Three models, each including three prognostic groups, were created. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were calculated. On multivariate analyses, performance score (KPS) and the number of brain metastases were significantly associated with survival. On univariate analyses, age showed a strong trend, and extra-cerebral cranial metastases a trend. In Model 1 (KPS, number of lesions), compared groups had 6-month survival rates of 15%, 38% and 57%. In Model 2 (KPS, lesions, age), rates were 17%, 33% and 75%, and in Model 3 (KPS, lesions, age, extra-cerebral metastases), 14%, 34% and 78%. PPVs for death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were 85% and 57% (Model 1), 83% and 75% (Model 2), and 86% and 78% (Model 3). Thus, all models were accurate in predicting death ≤ 6 months; poor-prognosis patients may not benefit from SIB. Models 2 and 3 were superior in predicting survival ≥ 6 months. Given that Model 3 requires more data (including extensive staging), Model 2 is considered favorable for many patients. If extra-cerebral metastases are already known or extensive staging has been performed, Model 3 can also be used.
In Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-05, the maximum tolerated dose of single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases of 21–30 mm was 18 Gy (biologically effective dose (BED) 45 Gy12). Since the patients in this study received prior brain irradiation, tolerable BED may be >45 Gy12 for de novo lesions. We investigated SRS and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) with a higher BED for radiotherapy-naive lesions. Patients receiving SRS (19–20 Gy) and patients treated with FSRT (30–48 Gy in 3–12 fractions) with BED > 49 Gy12 for up to 4 brain metastases were compared for grade ≥ 2 radiation necrosis (RN). In the entire cohort (169 patients with 218 lesions), 1-year and 2-year RN rates were 8% after SRS vs. 2% and 13% after FSRT (p = 0.73) in per-patient analyses, and 7% after SRS vs. 7% and 10% after FSRT (p = 0.59) in per-lesion analyses. For lesions ≤ 20 mm (137 patients with 185 lesions), the RN rates were 4% (SRS) vs. 0% and 15%, respectively, (FSRT) (p = 0.60) in per-patient analyses, and 3% (SRS) vs. 0% and 11%, respectively, (FSRT) (p = 0.80) in per-lesion analyses. For lesions > 20 mm (32 patients with 33 lesions), the RN rates were 50% (SRS) vs. 9% (FSRT) (p = 0.012) in both per-patient and per-lesion analyses. In the SRS group, a lesion size > 20 mm was significantly associated with RN; in the FSRT group, lesion size had no impact on RN. Given the limitations of this study, FSRT with BED > 49 Gy12 was associated with low RN risk and may be safer than SRS for brain metastases > 20 mm.
Background/Aim: Most patients with resected brain metastases receive post-operative radiotherapy. This study investigated outcomes of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) alone or whole-brain irradiation plus simultaneous integrated boost (WBI+SIB) in the postoperative setting. Patients and Methods: Forty-four patients receiving FSRT alone (n=32) or WBI+SIB (n=12) after resection of 1-3 brain metastases from 2014-2022 were analyzed. Twelve factors were evaluated for local control (LC), distant brain control (DBC), and overall survival (OS). Results: On univariate and multivariate analyses, single brain metastasis was associated with improved LC and DBC. Longer interval between tumor diagnosis and radiotherapy, single brain metastasis, and Karnofsky performance score >80 were associated with improved OS. WBI+SIB showed a trend towards better DBC. Conclusion: Several independent predictors of outcomes after FSRT or WBI+SIB following resection of brain metastases were identified. Given similar survival in the post-operative setting between FSRT and WBI+SIB, potential toxicity remains a significant factor in treatment recommendations.Resection of brain metastases is performed in many patients with a single, symptomatic, or few lesions (1, 2). In a randomized trial from 1998 including 95 patients, whole-brain irradiation (WBI) after resection of a single brain metastasis led to significantly improved local control (LC) and freedom from distant brain metastases (distant brain control, DBC) (3). Since then, many patients with resectable brain metastases received postoperative WBI. However, WBI is associated with a considerable risk of neuro-cognitive decline. Therefore, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), which can be administered as a single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or as fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), is increasingly used for the treatment of brain metastases (4-12). Initially, SRT was investigated for intact (unresected) brain metastases. In a retrospective study of 186 patients with 1-3 brain metastases, SRS alone resulted in better LC than WBI alone and was not inferior with respect to DBC and overall survival (OS) (6). Aiming to further improve outcomes of patients with a limited number of brain metastases, several studies investigated the combination of SRS and WBI and compared this approach to SRS alone (4, 5, 7-10). In these studies, the addition of WBI resulted in better intracerebral control (and sometimes also better LC) but did not improve OS. Moreover, in two randomized trials, WBI led to significantly higher rates of neuro-cognitive deficits (4, 5). Therefore, radiation oncologists have become more reserved regarding the addition of WBI to SRS or FSRT. This holds true also for radiotherapy following resection of brain metastases (13). In single-arm studies that investigated post-operative SRS or FSRT alone, the 1-year LC rates ranged between 61% and 97.5% and the 1-year DBC rates between 36% and 69% (14-22). In a randomized trial, post-operative SRS significantly improved...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.