NTS is an effective medium to deliver a simple theory-based psychological intervention to enhance self-efficacy for diabetes self-management. Reduced clinic attendance, combined with NTS, did not result in a deterioration of HbA(1c). Intensive personal support needs to be combined with intensive diabetes therapy to improve glycaemic control in this age group.

No abstract

The increase in research into psychopathology in people with intellectual disability has recently spread to include depression. Several reports have appeared on the assessment of depression in the client group and there is a pressing need for research into treatment of depression in people with intellectual disability. The present paper reviews cognitive behaviour therapy for depression and reports on its adaptation for people with intellectual disability. Two case studies of individuals with mild intellectual disability illustrate the clinical applications. All the elements of cognitive behaviour therapy for depression were maintained and simplified. Both subjects were able to monitor their feelings of depression and subject 2 monitored the frequency of suicidal thoughts. Improvements were seen in both cases on the Zung Depression Inventory and daily monitoring of depressive feelings.

The data reported here suggest that the DIRQ has the potential to be a useful tool for clinical assessment and evaluating the impact of psycho-educational and medical interventions.

Objectives The COVID‐19 pandemic is having considerable impact on cancer care, including restricted access to hospital‐based care, treatment and psychosocial support. We investigated the impact on unmet needs and psychosocial well‐being. Methods One hundred and forty four participants (77% female), including people with cancer and their support networks, were recruited. The most prevalent diagnosis was breast cancer. Forty‐one participants recruited pre‐pandemic were compared with 103 participants recruited during the COVID‐19 pandemic. We measured participants' unmet supportive care needs, psychological distress and quality of life. Results Half of our patient respondents reported unexpected changes to treatment following pandemic onset, with widespread confusion about their longer‐term consequences. Although overall need levels have not increased, specific needs have changed in prominence. People with cancer reported significantly reduced anxiety (p = 0.049) and improved quality of life (p = 0.032) following pandemic onset, but support network participants reported reduced quality of life (p = 0.009), and non‐significantly elevated anxiety, stress and depression. Conclusion Psychological well‐being of people with cancer has not been detrimentally affected by pandemic onset. Reliance on home‐based support to compensate for the lost availability of structured healthcare pathways may, however, explain significant and detrimental effects on the well‐being and quality of life of people in their support and informal care networks.