Background
New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication after a solid organ transplant. NODAT occurs in 2% to 53% of all solid organ transplant recipients. The identification of high-risk patients and the implementation of measures to limit the development of NODAT can improve the long-term patient prognosis.
Material/Methods
Our study group consisted of 336 patients undergoing heart transplant. Patients with prior diabetes (60 patients) were excluded from analysis. The remaining 276 patients were divided in 2 groups: with NODAT (n=109) and without NODAT (n=167). Logistic regression analysis was used for NODAT risk factor assessment.
Results
NODAT occurred in 109 (32%) out of 336 patients without diagnosed diabetes before heart transplantation. Risk factors for post-transplant diabetes mellitus, which was shown by the analysis of the collected data, were BMI at discharge (OR=1.082, CI 1.011–1.158, p=0.0233), history of diagnosed CMV infection (OR=1.464, CI 1.068–2.007, p=0.0179), and age over 51 years (OR=1.634, CI 1.274–2.095, p=0.0001).
Conclusions
1. New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) or long-lasting hypoglycemia (over 2 years after transplantation) was diagnosed in 32% patients after heart transplantation developed. 2. The risk factors of NODAT were BMI at discharge and history of diagnosed CMV infection, and age over 51 years was an independent risk factor.
IntroductionSternum closure techniques have been compared regarding biomechanics, efficacy in high-risk patients and prevention of mediastinitis or sternal dehiscence. There are no papers concerning patients’ comfort and postoperative rehabilitation rate.AimTo establish the best surgical closure technique after midline sternotomy regarding the lowest pain level in the postoperative period and the highest rate of postoperative rehabilitation.Material and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 100 patients after cardiothoracic procedures which was divided into 3 subgroups according to sternal closure technique based on postoperative thoracic X-ray. To assess patients’ pain and their physical activity we used a custom questionnaire. The statistical analysis was performed on the data regarding occurrence of wound healing complications risk factors, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain score, the number of days until achieving important rehabilitations stages and the occurrence of sternal refixation.ResultsSubgroups had 35, 33 and 32 patients. The statistical analysis showed significantly lower NRS scores between the 14th (p = 0.0012) (1.17) and 30th (p = 0.0196) day (0.65) after the procedure in the group sutured with only single interrupted wire. There was also a significant difference in the number of days between the operation and the first time the patient could lie sideways (p = 0.0105). There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups regarding other measured factors.ConclusionsThe single wire suture provides less pain at the 14th and 30th day postoperatively measured on the NRS and ensures faster rehabilitation compared to sternal closing technique which involves placing both single and figure-of-8 sutures.
New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is one of the most common and serious complications of solid organ transplantation. The incidence of NODAT is estimated to range from 2% to 53%. Patients who develop new onset diabetes after transplantation are significantly more frequently exposed to a higher risk of death and cardiovascular incidents as well as other adverse effects, such as decreased patient survival, higher infection rates and early graft loss. Identifying high-risk patients, undertaking preventive action and applying appropriate treatment can limit the development of new onset diabetes after transplantation and improve a patient's long-term prognosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.