BACKGROUND: Rare studies have reported the application of multiple ancillary tests to the diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorder in serous effusions. In the current study, the authors evaluated the effectiveness of using an algorithm for the triage of serous effusions and the contribution of ancillary studies to achieve a specific subtype of lymphoproliferative disorder. METHODS: Serous effusion samples that had a final diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorder or suspicious for lymphoma were selected from cases that were diagnosed between 2001 and 2010. Data were collected on patient and sample characteristics as well as results from immunophenotype and molecular studies. RESULTS: In total, 168 serous effusions were identified from 110 patients. The most common site of involvement was the pleural cavity (n ¼ 133) followed by the peritoneal cavity (n ¼ 30) and pericardial cavity (n ¼ 5). The volume of serous effusions ranged from 2 mL to 1000 mL (mean, 238 mL). In 42 patients (38.2%), serous effusions were the primary source of diagnosis. In 129 patients who had a diagnosis of LPD, either generic (n ¼ 82) or specific (n ¼ 47) ancillary tests were performed as a single test in 58 samples (67.4%) or as a combination of multiple studies in 19 samples (23.2%). Immunophenotyping was successful in almost all samples that had a specific subtype with 16 B-cell and 4 T-cell lymphomas being diagnosed. More samples with a specific subtype of lymphoma underwent molecular tests compared with those who had a generic diagnosis (19.1% vs 13.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Successful, specific subtyping of lymphoproliferative disorders was achieved in approximately 33% of cases that were tested for ancillary studies following an approach for the triage and aliquoting of serous effusion samples.

Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is important in predicting a response to targeted therapies in breast cancer. Immunohistochemical assays to determine hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status must therefore be accurate and reproducible. Tissue fixation has been shown to play a crucial role in determining consistency in quality. Although guidelines impose upper limits for the fixation period, the data on which these limits are based are scant. This study aimed to prospectively examine the effect of fixation of >72 hours on these assays. In 101 invasive breast cancer samples, HR and HER2 status was compared between tumor blocks undergoing a short fixation period with those undergoing a period of prolonged fixation (PF). Discordances were classified as an incremental change between categories of (i) a single order of magnitude, that is a difference in the status of low positive (Allred score 3) compared with positive (Allred score 4 to 8) or negative (Allred score 0 or 2) and vice versa for HRs and a difference in HER2 status of equivocal compared with negative or positive and vice versa or (ii) greater than a single order of magnitude, that is a difference in the status of positive compared with negative or vice versa. The median fixation time for the short fixation group was 13 hours and 18 minutes (mean, 13 h 17 min; range, 10 h 33 min to 17 h 45 min) and for the PF group was 79 hours 22 minutes (mean, 79 h 35 min; range, 73 h 33 min to 102 h 30 min). Eight cases showed discordances, all of which were of a single order of magnitude including 1 for ER, 5 for PR, and 2 for HER2. In 6 of these, a higher score was seen in the PF group. In conclusion, fixation for limited periods beyond 72 hours does not result in a reduction in assay sensitivity in the determination of ER, PR, or HER2 immunohistochemical status.

BACKGROUND: Touch preparations (TPs) can be performed for on-site adequacy assessment of core needle biopsies (CNBs). Although TPs can play a role in decreasing the number of nondiagnostic core biopsies, the impact of TPs on CNB has not been extensively evaluated. METHODS: Computerized tomography-guided CNBs performed in a tertiary cancer center were retrospectively identified. On-site adequacy assessment was performed in all cases. The matching TPs and CNBs were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy of the TP. The relation between the site of biopsy and the cellularity of the CNB was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1100 CNB cases with associated TPs were identified over a 6-month period.Eighty-four cases (8%) showed marked differences in cellularity between CNB and TP, and 43 of these 84 cases (4.3%)showed the presence of diagnostic cells in either CNB or TP, but not in both. Lung was the biopsy site where CNB was most affected by loss of diagnostic cells. CONCLUSIONS: TP and CNB findings must be integrated to prevent a misdiagnosis. Lung CNBs were more frequently affected by performing TPs. Cancer