Introduction Anxiety is a common symptom for those experiencing dementia and is associated with worse outcomes. The aim of the study was to examine which anxiety tools have been validated compared with a gold standard diagnostic criterion in persons with dementia. Methods We completed a systematic review of the literature, which was registered a priori with PROSPERO (CRD42016042123). Three databases were searched, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO, as well as the gray literature. Abstracts and full text were searched in duplicate for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate. Results We identified 9626 citations from all sources after duplicates were removed. Many excluded studies used tools for anxiety, for which no diagnostic accuracy study was identified. Four articles were included in the final synthesis. Included articles had between 32 to 101 participants with mild to moderate dementia. The gold standard criteria focused on either generalized anxiety or all anxiety subtypes. The prevalence of anxiety was between 27.7% and 63.4%. Three tools were examined, the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and the Rating Anxiety in Dementia (RAID) scale. Sensitivity varied but was the highest in the RAID at 90% and lowest in the self-rated version of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (58%). Discussion Given how burdensome the symptoms of anxiety are to persons with dementia, valid tools are needed to help identify symptoms. We identified three validated tools, but further validation of these and other tools are needed. Practitioners should consider the use of tools with high sensitivity such as the RAID in persons with dementia.
Aims To assess the association between vascular complications of diabetes and the risk of congenital malformations in pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes. Methods We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study in women with Type 1 diabetes who received care consecutively from three tertiary care diabetes‐in‐pregnancy clinics in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between vascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy and pre‐existing hypertension) and congenital malformations in offspring of women with Type 1 diabetes. Results Of 232 women with Type 1 diabetes, 49 (21%) had at least one vascular complication and there were 52 babies with congenital malformations. Maternal age (31.8 ± 5.0 vs. 29.4 ± 4.7 years, P < 0.01), diabetes duration (20.9 ± 6.7 vs. 11.2 ± 7.4 years, P < 0.01) and pre‐eclampsia rate (12.5% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.01) were higher in mothers with vascular complications than in those without. Multivariable analyses showed that vascular complications were not associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 2.88). Conclusions Vascular complications are common, occurring in one‐fifth of pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes, and in this study do not appear to be associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations in children.
Amiodarone is an antiarrhythmic medication with many side effects. Neuromyopathy is a rare adverse effect. We present an 87-year-old woman with bilateral leg pain and weakness in the context of amiodarone. She was admitted to the Acute Geriatric Unit in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. On examination, hip flexor and extensor strength were 2/5 bilaterally while knee flexor and extensor strength were 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. Creatine kinase and C-reactive protein levels were normal. MRI of the lumbar spine showed mild central canal stenosis. Electromyography and nerve conduction testing showed a severe axonal length-dependent polyneuropathy of the left lower extremity. There was evidence of myopathic changes to the left iliopsoas muscle. Overall, a neuromyopathic process affecting the lower extremities was supported. After discontinuation of amiodarone, mobility and function significantly improved. Although a rare complication of amiodarone, neuromyopathy should be considered in patients with compatible symptomatology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.