Background and Objectives:The use of routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains an area of debate. In this study, we investigated the routine use of IOC in a single center, to determine whether it confers a reduced risk of common bile duct (CBD) injury and improved patient outcomes. We also identified several preoperative predictive factors for CBD stone detection on IOC to investigate the feasibility of a predictive model.Methods:We identified 1005 LCs with routine IOC over a 2-year period at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2015. Outcomes measured included CBD stone detection on IOC, CBD injury, complication rates, readmission rate, and mortality. We also calculated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for detection of CBD stones on IOC from preoperative biochemistry and radiological investigations.Results:We identified a CBD stone detection rate of 10.1% and a readmission rate of 0.03%, with no reported CBD injuries and 1 reported mortality. Of the preoperative predictive factors investigated, the most specific for CBD stone detection on IOC was bilirubin at 89%. The most sensitive was preoperative MRCP at 77%.Discussion:This study demonstrates that routine IOC is an effective method of detecting CBD stones and CBD injuries, resulting in improved patient outcomes and economic benefits for health services. We have also identified several predictive factors for CBD stones on IOC.
The world diabetes population quadrupled between 1980 and 2014 to 422 million and the enormous impact of Type 2 diabetes is recognised by the recent creation of national Type 2 diabetes prevention programmes. There is uncertainty about how to correctly risk stratify people for entry into prevention programmes, how combinations of multiple ‘at high risk’ glycemic categories predict outcome, and how the large recently defined ‘at risk’ population based on an elevated glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) should be managed. We identified all 141,973 people at highest risk of diabetes in our population, and screened 10,000 of these with paired fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c for randomisation into a very large Type 2 diabetes prevention trial. Baseline discordance rate between highest risk categories was 45.6%, and 21.3–37.0% of highest risk glycaemic categories regressed to normality between paired baseline measurements (median 40 days apart). Accurate risk stratification using both fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c data, the use of paired baseline data, and awareness of diagnostic imprecision at diagnostic thresholds would avoid substantial overestimation of the true risk of Type 2 diabetes and the potential benefits (or otherwise) of intervention, in high risk subjects entering prevention trials and programmes.
Our evaluation of two international samples of randomly selected reported clinical stories highlights the importance of detailed descriptions of circumstances under which suspected ADRs occur. Without the case story, crucial misinterpretation of case reports could lead to wrong regulatory decisions and deny clinically useful information to healthcare practitioners. ■
Hereditary breast cancer accounts for 5%-10% of breast cancer cases. The majority of familial cases have been linked to germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, though other high penetrance susceptibility genes have also been identified through genomic testing advances. Optimal surgical treatment for these patients, who are of a younger age, has several challenges as it usually involves aggressive therapeutic and risk reducing interventions. At the same time, the therapeutic armamentarium for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers apart from platinum salts, has been enriched with the addition of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with promising outcomes. In this review we provide a succinct and comprehensive overview of the surgical and systemic treatment options for patients with BRCA1/2 mutation related breast cancer and an update on the most recent systemic treatment advances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.