However, due to information asymmetry between job providers and applicants (Vogel et al., 2016), the former attempt to sell the latter on the job and the company (Billsberry, 2007; Sthapit, 2010), while the latter strive to convince the former that they are the most capable candidate (Kristof-Brown, Barrick, & Franke, 2002). As such, both parties can hold unrealistic expectations of the other. Based on the job information that newcomers gathered during the job search process and post-hire stages (Saks & Ashforth, 1997, 2002), newcomers may form initial perceptions towards their job after they have entered the organization (Baur, Buckley, Bagdasarov, & Dharmasiri, 2014). Hence, person-job (P-J) misfit is more likely to occur when newcomers realize that their knowledge, skills, or abilities do not match the job demands (i.e. demand-ability misfit; D-A misfit) or that the job does not satisfy their personal needs (i.e. need-supply misfit; N-S misfit). As noted by Kristof-Brown and Guay (2011), "misfit is a subject that has been largely overlooked by researchers, we know little about how [these employees] behave or cope." Therefore, several important research questions remain unaddressed in the misfit literature. First, although a few researchers have quantitatively explored the negative consequences of employee misfit (e.g.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.