Reading in a second language (L2) is not a monolingual event; L2 readers have access to their
first language (L1) as they read, and many use it as a strategy to help comprehend an L2 text.
Owing to difficulties in observing the comprehension process, little research has been conducted
to determine what role the L1 plays in the reading strategies of L2 readers. Using think-aloud
protocols and retrospective interviews with 20 native speakers of Chinese and Japanese at three
levels of language proficiency studying in the United States, this study explores further the
question of when L2 readers use their L1 cognitive resources and how this cognitive use of the L1
helps them comprehend an L2 text. We conclude by suggesting that the results support a
sociocultural view of the L2 reading process.
Minimal research has been conducted in reading Chinese as a second/ foreign language (CSI/CFL). In an effort to further the understanding of the reading process, this study, utilizing think aloud and retelling procedures, focuses on the identification of strategies that American university students applied to read Chinese texts (narrative and argumentative), and the difficulties encountered when processing texts for meaning. Also it examines whether Bernhardt's constructivist model can account for the reading process of the CFL learners at the intermediate proficiency level. The results show that the CFL readers employed bottom‐up and top‐down processing strategies, that their difficulties were pertinent to vocabulary, orthography, grammar, and background knowledge, and that Bernhardt's reading model could account for the reading process of CFL learners with minor modification.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.