Background: There is scant information on the proportion, risk factors and outcome of lacunar infarction in China. Methods: Prospective registry data entered within 1 month after a first-ever stroke between March 2002 and March 2007 were used from 4 Chinese hospitals. Data regarding stroke risk factors and baseline characteristics were examined in a long-term follow-up. Case fatality, death and dependency, and stroke recurrence were assessed at 30, 90, 180 days and 1 year. Predictive factors for death at 1 year in patients with lacunar infarction were tested by logistic regression analysis. We constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared groups with lacunar infarction and nonlacunar infarction by means of log rank tests for significant difference. Results: A total of 3,905 patients with first-ever cerebral infarction were included, of whom 1,650 (42.3%) had a lacunar infarction and 2,255 (57.7%) a nonlacunar infarction. Case fatality was lower in patients with lacunar infarction at all 4 time points (5.3, 6.4, 7.8 and 17.4%, respectively), as compared to patients with nonlacunar infarction (9.5, 14.3, 16.5 and 20.1%, respectively). Age, diabetes, smoking and NIHSS score at admission were the independent predictors for 1-year case fatality in patients with lacunar infarction. Death and dependency rates were also lower in patients with lacunar infarction than in those with nonlacunar infarction. Recurrent stroke was an important cause of death for lacunar infarction patients. Conclusions: The proportion of lacunar infarction in China is much higher than that in Western countries. The long-term prognosis of lacunar infarction is not benign.
Despite evidence of a relationship among obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), metabolic dysregulation, and diabetes, it is uncertain whether OSA treatment can improve metabolic parameters. We sought to determine effects of long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on glycemic control and diabetes risk in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and OSA.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSBlood, medical history, and personal data were collected in a substudy of 888 participants in the Sleep Apnea cardioVascular Endpoints (SAVE) trial in which patients with OSA and stable CVD were randomized to receive CPAP plus usual care, or usual care alone. Serum glucose and glycated hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 2 and 4 years and incident diabetes diagnoses recorded.
RESULTSMedian follow-up was 4.3 years. In those with preexisting diabetes (n 5 274), there was no significant difference between the CPAP and usual care groups in serum glucose, HbA 1c , or antidiabetic medications during follow-up. There were also no significant between-group differences in participants with prediabetes (n 5 452) or new diagnoses of diabetes. Interaction testing suggested that women with diabetes did poorly in the usual care group, while their counterparts on CPAP therapy remained stable.
CONCLUSIONSAmong patients with established CVD and OSA, we found no evidence that CPAP therapy over several years affects glycemic control in those with diabetes or prediabetes or diabetes risk over standard-of-care treatment. The potential differential effect according to sex deserves further investigation.Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repeated episodes of upper-airway collapse during sleep that causes intermittent hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, and daytime sleepiness. The standard therapy for OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to prevent airway obstruction (1).OSA is common in the population and strongly associated with obesity (2). Prospective cohort studies have found associations between moderate to severe OSA and
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.