To enable all listed companies to gradually upgrade and implement corporate governance, the appraisals are promoted to assist investors through the comparison of corporate governance appraisal (CGA) in Taiwan’s market. Using a panel data is based on the companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange during the period 2014-2016; this paper provides evidence that earnings management is affected negatively by corporate governance quality. This is expected to guide healthy competition between enterprises and strengthen corporate governance. Recent studies have pointed out that managers are more favorable to their actions due to weak corporate governance. While most studies explored the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance, few studies have included in corporate governance appraisal (CGA). This study examines how CGA in Taiwan listed companies will affect their earnings quality and this study uses earnings management (EM) as measure of financial performance. In addition, reference is made to the Big 4 accounting firms to explain the consequences of CGA and, specifically, its effect on the quality of financial statements. The empirical results show that CGA and earnings management have a significantly negative correlation. In addition, the CGA of companies audited by the Big 4 indicate that those with better earnings quality also conduct less earnings management.

This study examines the corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of listed companies in Taiwan by looking at how companies meet their CSR obligations and by exploring how employing supply-chain certified public accountants (CSRSCPAs) affects the quality of their earnings. However, despite the benefits stemming from enhanced information corroboration and expertise spillover, CSRSCPAs face the challenge of potential information collusion. Hence, this study looks at supply-chain CPAs in the context of the company's CSR performance to find out the impact of the company's financial statements. It finds that the CSRSCPA has a negative effect on discretionary accruals.The inclusion of different supply chain streams reveal that upstream CSRSCPA are more likely than mid-stream and downstream CSRSCPAs to receive favorable reactions from market participants. This response is an indication that market participants are impressed by the specific expertise and knowledge of these professionals.

With the development of COVID-19, the corporate value evaluation model has gradually changed from traditional concepts to the digital information. This article aims to analyse how the value chain of human resource management practice creates competitive advantages and value for enterprises, focuses on the value chain model, and explores value activities in practice. The decision-making model and research topic direction of human resource management are put forward to provide a reference for personnel management. Combining AMO (ability, motivation, and opportunity), employee competence, employee motivation, employee opportunity, and to use the following formula to maximize the organization’s revenue. Digital transformation has improved the quality of human resource management. This study is based on the implementation of human resource management systems and human resources in listed companies in Taiwan. The survey results show that capital, employee engagement, organizational behaviour, and digital transformation help practitioners understanding. JEL classification numbers: M1, M12. Keywords: Enterprise Value, Competitive Advantage, Organizational Performance, Digital Transformation.

<p>This research explores the corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of listed companies in Taiwan by looking at how companies meet their CSR obligations and by exploring how employing supply chain certified public accountants (CSRSCPAs) affects the quality of their earnings. However, despite the benefits stemming from enhanced information corroboration and expertise spillover, CSRSCPAs face the challenge of potential information collusion. It finds that the CSRSCPA has a negative effect on discretionary accruals. Hence, this study looks at supply chain CPAs in the context of the company’s CSR performance to find out the impact of the company’s financial statements. In addition, the results of this study indicate that both a positive earnings quality and a positive public response ensue when the Big 4 audit firms audit CSR companies. Our results show that market participants highly value Big 4 supply chain CPAs with industry experience and that these impressions extend to their evaluation of clients. The inclusion of different supply chain streams reveal that upstream CSRSCPA are more likely than middlestream and downstream CSRSCPA to receive favorable reactions from market participants. This is an indication that market participants are impressed by the specific expertise and knowledge of these professionals.</p>