No abstract

BackgroundPathological response is an important marker for tumor aggressiveness in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who receive preoperative chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy. We aim to evaluate the prognostic value of histological factors after trimodality treatments.Methods91 patients who received preoperative chemoradiation followed by transthoracic esophagectomy between 2009 and 2014 were included. The pathological examination was reviewed. Overall survival and disease free survival were recorded. Survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression model, and the survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.ResultsSurvival analysis showed lymphovascular invasion (LVI, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.009, p = 0.029), perineural invasion (PNI, HR: 2.226, p = 0.019), ypN stage (HR: 2.041, p = 0.019), extracapsular invasion (ECI, HR: 2.804, p = 0.003), and incomplete resection (HR: 1.897, p = 0.039) as unfavorable prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS). Moreover, tumor regression grade (TRG, HR: 1.834, p = 0.038), LVI (HR: 1.975, p = 0.038), ECI (HR: 2.836, p = 0.003), and incomplete resection (HR: 2.254, p = 0.007) adversely affected disease-free survival (DFS). Prognostic classification based on poor primary tumor (TRG2/3, LVI(+), and PNI (+)), lymph node (ypN(+) and ECI(+)), and surgical (incomplete resection) factors significantly predicts OS (p = 0.013) and DFS (p = 0.017). However, the use of postoperative adjuvant therapy was not a significant prognostic factor even in medium- and high-risk ESCC patients who underwent trimodality treatments.ConclusionsHistological factors, including primary tumor, lymph node, and surgical factors has high prognostic value for predicting outcomes in ESCC patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery.

No abstract

BackgroundEsophageal cancer patients experience severe symptoms and poor quality of life.ObjectiveWe examined the effects of a rehabilitation program on quality of life, sleep, rest-activity rhythms, anxiety, and depression of esophageal cancer patients.MethodsForty-four patients with esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to an experimental group, which underwent a 12-week brisk walking and diet education program, or a control group, which received standard care. Health-related quality of life, subjective and objective sleep quality, rest-activity rhythms, anxiety, and depression were assessed at baseline and post intervention.ResultsA generalized estimating equation analysis revealed that, after intervention, compared with the control group, the experimental group exhibited significantly improved reflux (P = .022; effect size, 0.32) and marginally improved emotional (P = .069; effect size, 0.27) and social (P = .069; effect size, 0.27) functions; constipation (P = .050; effect size, 0.29), eating difficulty (P = .058; effect size, 0.27), anxiety (P = .050; effect size, 0.29), and total sleep time (P = .068; effect size, 0.39).ConclusionsThe rehabilitation program may improve health-related quality of life and sleep and alleviate anxiety in patients with esophageal cancer.Implications for PracticeA rehabilitation program comprising exercise and diet education is a feasible and low-cost intervention for improving quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer. Healthcare team members may consider it as a nonpharmacological treatment option for patients.