This report details the numerical investigation of the performance characteristics and internal flow fields of an 86 mm radial turbine for a turbocharger application. A new blade was subsequently designed for the 86 mm rotor which departed from the conventional radial inlet blade angle to incorporate a 25° inlet blade angle. A comparative analysis between the two geometries is presented. Results show that the 25° back swept blade offers significant increases in efficiency while operating at lower than optimum velocity ratios (U/C). This enhanced efficiency at off-design conditions would significantly improve turbocharger performance where the turbine typically experiences lower than optimum velocity ratios while accelerating during engine transients. A commercial CFD code was used to construct single passage steady state numerical models. The numerical predictions show off-design performance gains of 2% can be achieved, while maintaining design point efficiency. Primary and secondary flow patterns are examined at various planes within the turbine blade passage and reasons for the increase in performance are discussed. A finite element analysis has been conducted to assess the stress implications of introducing a non-radial angle at turbine rotor inlet. A modal analysis was also carried out in order to identify the natural frequencies of the turbine geometry, thus calculating the critical speeds corresponding to the induction of the excitational frequencies from the stator vanes. Although the new blade design has resulted in stress increases in some regions, the numerical study has shown that it is feasible from both an aerodynamic and structural point of view to increase the performance characteristic of a radial turbine through the implementation of back swept blading.
This report details the numerical and experimental investigation of the performance characteristics of a conventional radial turbine compared with a new back swept design for the same application. The blade geometry of an existing turbine from a turbocharger was used as a baseline. A new back swept blade was subsequently designed for the rotor, which departed from the conventional radial inlet blade angle to incorporate a 25° inlet blade angle. A comparative numerical analysis between the two geometries is presented. Results show that the 25° back swept blade offers significant increases in efficiency while operating at lower than optimum velocity ratios (U/C). Improvements in efficiency at off-design conditions could significantly improve turbocharger performance since the turbine typically experiences lower than optimum velocity ratios while accelerating during engine transients. A commercial CFD code was used to construct single passage steady state numerical models. The numerical predictions show off-design performance gains of 2% can be achieved, while maintaining design point efficiency. A finite element stress analysis was conducted to show that the nonradial inlet blade angle could be implemented without exceeding the acceptable stress levels for the rotor. A modal analysis was also carried out in order to identify the natural blade frequencies, showing that these were not significantly changed by the implementation of backswept blading. A prototype backswept rotor was produced and tested in a direct comparison with the baseline rotor geometry. Experimental performance results showed strong correlations with those obtained numerically, and verified the predicted performance gains at off-deign velocity ratios. This numerical and experimental study has shown that it is feasible from both an aerodynamic and structural point of view to improve the performance characteristic of a radial turbine at lower than optimum velocity ratios through the implementation of back swept blading.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.