Patients starting Olz and Cloz tend to have better outcomes at 6 months than patients who start other antipsychotics in actual out-patient clinical practice. The results should be interpreted conservatively because of the non-randomized study design.

Patients treated with olanzapine, quetiapine and clozapine had better tolerability outcomes regarding EPS and sexual related dysfunctions compared with patients receiving risperidone, amisulpride and typicals. Patients treated with olanzapine and clozapine had higher weight increases than patients treated with risperidone, quetiapine and typicals.

The present study aimed to compare health outcomes and tolerability according to antipsychotic medication (olanzapine, risperidone or an oral typical antipsychotic) after 6 months of treatment in a group of 919 schizophrenic patients who had never previously been treated with antipsychotics. Demographic and clinical predictors of outcome were also identified. Data were extracted from the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study, a prospective, observational study of schizophrenia treatment in 10 European countries. Patients who initiated olanzapine were more likely to have a clinical response than those in the risperidone cohort, and had a greater improvement in quality of life than patients in the risperidone or typical antipsychotic cohorts. High negative and depression symptom scores at baseline and the presence of extrapyramidal symptoms at baseline predicted a worse clinical response, whereas hostile behaviour, paid employment and substance abuse predicted a better clinical outcome. The olanzapine cohort gained more weight than patients in the risperidone cohort, but no significant difference in weight gain was observed between olanzapine and the oral typical antipsychotic cohort. The results should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational study design.

This article focuses on the production and dissemination of photographic images by serving US soldiers in Iraq who are photographing their experiences and posting them on the Internet. This form of visual communication – in real time and communal – is new in the representation of warfare; in earlier wars soldiers took photographs, but these were not immediately shared in the way websites can disseminate images globally. This digital generation of soldiers exist in a new relationship to their experience of war; they are now potential witnesses and sources within the documentation of events, not just the imaged actors – a blurring of roles that reflects the correlations of revolutions in military and media affairs. This photography documents the everyday experiences of the soldiers and its historical significance may reside less in the controversial or revelatory images but in more mundane documentation of the environments, activities and feelings of American soldiery at war.