Percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) is a valuable procedure for obtaining tissue or cells for diagnosis, which is especially indispensable in thoracic oncology. Pneumothorax and hemoptysis are the most common complications of percutaneous needle biopsy of the lung. According to reports published over the past decades, pneumothorax incidence in patients who underwent TTNB greatly varies. The morbidity of pneumothorax after CT-guided TTNB depends on several factors, including size and depth of lesions, emphysema, the number of pleural surfaces and fissure crossed, etc. Attention to biopsy planning and technique and post-biopsy precautions help to prevent or minimize potential complications. Many measures can be taken to help prevent the progression of a pneumothorax, which in turn might reduce the number of pneumothoraces requiring chest tube placement. A multitude of therapeutic options is available for the treatment of pneumothorax, varying from observation and oxygen treatment, simple manual aspiration, to chest tube placement. When a pneumothorax develops during the biopsy procedure, it can be manually aspirated after the needle is retracted back into the pleural space or by inserting a separate needle into the pleural space. Biopsy side down positioning of the patient after biopsy significantly reduces the incidence of pneumothorax and the requirement of chest tube placement. Aspiration in biopsy side down position is also recommended for treating pneumothorax when simple manual aspiration is unsuccessful or delayed pneumothorax occurred. Chest tube placement is an important treatment strategy for patients with a large or symptomatic pneumothorax. Clinicians are encouraged to understand the development, prevention, and treatment of pneumothorax. Efforts should be made to reduce the incidence of pneumothorax in biopsy planning and post-biopsy precautions. When pneumothorax occurs, appropriate treatment should be adopted to reduce the risk of worsening pneumothorax.

PurposeTo investigate the effect of sleep disorder (SD) on the changes of brain network dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), we compared network connectivity patterns among MCI, SD, and comorbid MCI and sleep disorders (MCI-SD) patients using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (RS-fMRI).Patients and MethodsA total of 60 participants were included in this study, 20 each with MCI, SD, or MCI-SD. And all participants underwent structural and functional MRI scanning. The default-mode network (DMN) was extracted by independent component analysis (ICA), and regional functional connectivity strengths were calculated and compared among groups.ResultsCompared to MCI patients, The DMN of MCI-SD patients demonstrated weaker functional connectivity with left middle frontal gyrus, right superior marginal gyrus, but stronger connectivity with the left parahippocampus, left precuneus and left middle temporal gyrus. Compared to the SD group, MCI-SD patients demonstrated weaker functional connectivity with right transverse temporal gyrus (Heschl’s gyrus), right precentral gyrus, and left insula, but stronger connectivity with posterior cerebellum, right middle occipital gyrus, and left precuneus.ConclusionPatients with MCI-SD show unique changes in brain network connectivity patterns compared to MCI or SD alone, likely reflecting a broader functional disconnection and the need to recruit more brain regions for functional compensation.

To determine the influence of puncture site on aspiration in dealing with pneumothorax following CT-guided lung biopsy. Two hundred thirty-six pneumothorax patients after CT guided lung biopsies were retrospective analyzed from January 2013 to December 2018. Patients with minor asymptomatic pneumothorax were treated conservatively with monitoring of vital signs and follow-up CT to confirm stability. Ninety of the 236 pneumothorax patients, who underwent manual aspiration, were included in this analysis. In first manual aspiration, the needle from the lesion was retracted back into the pleural space after biopsy, and then aspiration treatment was performed. If the treatment is of unsatisfied result, a second attempt aspiration treatment, which puncture site away from initial biopsy one, was conducted. The efficacy of simple manual aspiration and the new method, changing puncture site for re-aspiration was observed. Immediate success was obtained in 62 out of the 90 patients in the first attempt. The effective rate and failure rate were 68.9% (62/90) and 31.1% (28/90), respectively. Twenty-eight patients in whom first attempt simple aspiration were unsuccessful underwent a second attempt aspiration, which puncture site away from initial biopsy one, was successful in 13 patients with 15 patients undergoing chest tube placement. The effective rate and failure rate were 46.4% (13/28) and 53.6% (15/28), respectively. Applying the modified procedure, total effective rate of aspiration elevated significantly from 68.9% (62/90) to 83.3% (75/90) (P < .05). No serious side effects were detected in the period of aspiration procedure. Manual aspiration with puncture site away from initial biopsy one is worth trying to deal with post-biopsy pneumothorax. This modified procedure improved the efficiency of treatment significantly, and reduced the rate of pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement.

Background:To assess the effect of aspiration in the biopsy-side down position to deal with delayed pneumothorax after computed tomography (CT)-guided lung biopsy.Methods: A retrospective review was performed of the 236 delayed pneumothorax patients who underwent CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsies (TTNBs). Asymptomatic minimal pneumothorax patients were managed conservatively. Manual aspirations were applied for symptomatic cases with minimal pneumothorax and all cases with moderate to large pneumothorax. Patients were included into two groups: in group A (35 patients), aspiration was performed in the same position as the biopsy, while in group B (54 patients), patients were turned to the biopsy-side down position (from supine to prone or vice versa), and aspiration was conducted. The efficacy of two approaches was evaluated.Results: One hundred forty-seven (62.3%) asymptomatic cases resolved without treatment. Distance between parietal and visceral pleura before and after aspiration were 4.24±1.87 and 1.93±2.33 cm for group A, 3.92±1.31 and 0.98±1.50 cm for group B, respectively. Volume of aspirated air in group A and group B were 735.4±231.8 and 434.8±320.3 mL, respectively. Complete lung expansion was detected in 28.6% (10/35) and 38.9% (21/54) for group A and group B, respectively. The overall effective rate and failure rate were 74.3% (26/35) and 25.7%(9/35) for group A, 92.6% (50/54) and 7.4%((4/54)(for group B, respectively, which have significant statistic difference (P<0.05).Conclusions: Manual aspiration in biopsy-side down position demonstrates the safety and efficacy in treating delayed pneumothorax after CT-guided TTNBs. Thus reduce the rate of pneumothorax requiring drainage catheter placement. (4,5). Simple aspiration and tube thoracostomy were recommended to deal with the pneumothorax. As reported, tube thoracostomy is associated with more complications and resulted in a longer stay in hospital than simple aspiration (6). Many previous reports have shown that increasing delayed pneumothoraces often need chest tube placement. Patient positioning after biopsy has been studied but remains controversial, some study found that placing the patients biopsy-side down (from prone to supine or vice versa) after biopsy substantially reduced the rate of pneumothorax (5,7), while some other articles found no effect (8,9). Anecdotally, we noted in practice some satisfactory results were achieved by using aspiration in biopsy-side down position. We reported our preliminary experience using a modified manual aspiration in the biopsy-side down position in an attempt to deal with delayed pneumothorax caused by biopsy, thus reduce the application of tube thoracostomy significantly. MethodsThis retrospective study was approved by the Ethical Committee and Institutional Review Board of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (No. NSMC1601-018). A retrospective review was performed of the clinical records and radiological findings of 1750 consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided TTNB for lung le...

Neuroradiological methods play important roles in neurology, especially in cerebrovascular diseases. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) is frequently encountered in patients with acute ischemic stroke and significant intracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and the clinical implications of FVH have been a matter of debate. FVH is associated with large-vessel occlusion or severe stenosis, as well as impaired hemodynamics. Possible explanations suggested for its appearance include stationary blood and slow antegrade or retrograde filling of the leptomeningeal collateral circulation. However, the prognostic value of the presence of FVH has been controversial. FVH can also be observed in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA), which may have different pathomechanisms. Its presence can help clinicians to identify patients who have a higher risk of stroke after TIA. In this review article, we aim to describe the mechanism and influencing factors of FVH, as well as its clinical significance in patients with cerebrovascular disease.