Introduction: The legal issues in this writing include how are the legal arrangements regarding the settlement of general election administration by Bawaslu and how to resolve election disputes by Bawaslu. Purposes of the Research: This writing aims to find out and analyze how to resolve violations of general election administration by Bawaslu. Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative, that is, research that primarily examines positive legal provisions and legal principles, explain and predicts in the direcrion of future legal developments Results Originality Findings of the Research: The findings of this study prove that in legal arrangements regarding the settlement of election administrative violations by Bawaslu and the settlement mechanism that in an effort to resolve administrative violations, Bawaslu has the authority to resolve administrative violations in accordance with the provisions of the Bawaslu laws and regulations and the General Election Commission. The settlement mechanism based on the Election Law is not explained significantly but it is explained that non-criminal violations are administrative violations and these violations are reported and followed up by Bawaslu and the General Elections Commission.

Introduction: The legal issues in this paper are how the legal construction/character of abuse of authority in corruption crimes and how the basis for the enforcement of offenses/norms of abuse of authority in corruption Purposes of the Research:  This writing aims to find out and analyze the legal construction/character of the abuse of authority in corruption Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative, that is, research that primarily examines positive legal provisions and legal principles, explain and predicts in the direcrion of future legal developments. Results/Originality of the Research: The results show that or The findings of this study prove that abuse of authority and abuse of authority is the core of the concept of administrative law relating to the source or birth of authority. This has consequences for the concept of legal responsibility that was born from deviations from the principle of objectives that have been given to the authority.

Introduction: The legal issues in this writing is whether the act of transporting dangerous goods (B-3) that is not notified to the portmaster about the conditions of transportation can be qualified as a crime and whether the actions of the captain of transporting dangerous goods (B-3) are not appropriate. With the shipping requirements can be asked for criminal liability.Purposes of the Research:  This writing aims to find out and analyze the act of transporting dangerous goods (B-3 waste) that does not notify its capacity can be qualified as a crime, as well as discussing criminal responsibility for the actions of the captain who transports dangerous goods (B-3) that do not comply with shipping requirements.Methods of the Research: The research method used is normative, that is, research that primarily examines positive legal provisions and legal principles, explain and predicts in the direcrion of future legal developments.Results of the Research: The findings of this study prove that in the transportation of waste and special goods pays attention to the specifications of the ship. And the skipper as the carrier of dangerous goods (B-3) and special goods using transportation in waters without regard to specifications can be criminally accounted for from the criminal aspect on the basis of violating the provisions of Article 328 of Law no. 17 of 2008 in conjunction with Article 102 of Law no. 32 of 2009, because all the elements have been fulfilled, namely everyone who transports hazardous and toxic waste without paying attention to the specifications of the ship. The captain's actions violated Article 102 of Law no. 32 of 2009 and Article 328 of Law no. 17 of 2008, so that the captain can be sentenced to the heaviest criminal threat plus a third.