Objective: To suggest a national value for the diagnostic reference level (DRL) in terms of activity in MBq.kg-1 , for nuclear medicine procedures with fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) in whole body positron emission tomography (PET) scans of adult patients. Materials and Methods: A survey on values of 18 F-FDG activity administered in Brazilian clinics was undertaken by means of a questionnaire including questions about number and manufacturer of the installed equipment, model and detector type. The suggested DRL value was based on the calculation of the third quartile of the activity values distribution reported by the clinics. Results: Among the surveyed Brazilian clinics, 58% responded completely or partially the questionnaire; and the results demonstrated variation of up to 100% in the reported radiopharmaceutical activity. The suggested DRL for 18 F-FDG/PET activity was 5.54 MBq.kg-1 (0.149 mCi.kg-1). Conclusion: The present study has demonstrated the lack of standardization in administered radiopharmaceutical activities for PET procedures in Brazil, corroborating the necessity of an official DRL value to be adopted in the country. The suggested DLR value demonstrates that there is room for optimization of the procedures and 18 F-FDG/PET activities administered in Brazilian clinics to reduce the doses delivered to patients. It is important to highlight that this value should be continually revised and optimized at least every five years.
RAI in a single administration is safe in terms of deterministic effects because even high-administered activities do not result in absorbed doses that exceed the thresholds for significant tissue reactions. The Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Committee mathematical models are a practical method of quantifying the risks of a second primary cancer, demonstrating a marked decrease in risk for younger patients with the administration of lower RAI activities and suggesting that only the smallest activities necessary to promote an effective ablation should be administered in low-risk DTC patients.
Dosimetry at the cellular level has outperformed macrodosimetry in terms of agreement with toxicity effects in clinical studies. This fact has encouraged dosimetry studies aiming to quantify the absorbed doses needed to reach radiotoxicity at the cellular level and to inform recommendations on the administration of radium-223. The aim of this work is to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the absorbed doses of radium-223 and the interactions of the doses at the cellular level. The analysis was performed by Monte Carlo simulations in GATE using micro-CT image of a mouse. Two physics lists available in the GATE code were tested. The influence of single and multiple scattering models on the absorbed dose distribution and number of particle hits was also studied. In addition, the fuzzy c-means clustering method was used for data segmentation. The segmentation method was suitable for these analyses, particularly given that it was unsupervised. There was no significant difference in the estimated absorbed dose between the two proposed physics lists. The absorbed dose values were not significantly influenced by scattering, although single scattering resulted in twice as many interactions as multiple scattering. The absorbed dose histogram at the voxel level shows heterogeneous absorbed dose values within each shell, but the observations from the graph of the medians were comparable to those in the literature. The interaction histogram indicates 104 events, although some voxels had no interactions with alpha particles. However, the voxels did not show absorbed doses capable of deterministic effects in the deepest part of the bone marrow. The absorbed dose distribution in images of mouse trabecular bone was compatible with simple geometric models, with absorbed doses capable of deterministic effects near the bone surface. The interaction distributions need to be correlated with in vivo studies for better interpretation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.