A BS TRACT: Stereotactic lesioning of the bilateral globus pallidus (GPi) was one of the first surgical treatments for medication-refractory dystonia but has largely been abandoned in clinical practice after the introduction of deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, some patients with dystonia are not eligible for DBS. Therefore, we reviewed the efficacy, safety, and sustainability of bilateral pallidotomy by conducting a systematic review of individual patient data (IPD). Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and IPD were followed. In May 2020, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on outcome of bilateral pallidotomy for dystonia. If available, IPD were collected. In this systematic review, 100 patients from 33 articles were evaluated. Adverse events were reported in 20 patients (20%), of which 8 were permanent (8%). Preand postoperative Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Movement Scale scores were available for 53 patients. A clinically relevant improvement (>20%) of this score was found in 42 of 53 patients (79%). Twenty-five patients with status dystonicus (SD) were described. In all but 2 the SD resolved after bilateral pallidotomy. Seven patients experienced a relapse of SD. Median-reported follow-up was 12 months (n = 83; range: 2-180 months). Based on the current literature, bilateral pallidotomy is an effective and relatively safe procedure for certain types of dystonia, particularly in medication-refractory SD. Although due to publication bias the underreporting of negative outcomes is very likely, bilateral pallidotomy is a reasonable alternative to DBS in selected dystonia patients.

Background Since the first European-wide evaluation of dystonia management in 2016, several efforts have been made to improve dystonia-care. One of these was the development of the Dystonia Disease Group as a part of the European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases (ERN-RND) that implemented several initiatives based on the recommendations made in 2016. Aim To evaluate the current state of dystonia management across Europe. Methods Twenty-four countries were surveyed via 62 dystonia-experts from 44 ERN-RND-related centers. Results Dystonia-experts for adult patients were available in all surveyed countries. However, almost half of the countries evaluated accessibility as merely ‘satisfactory’. Access to genetic and neurophysiological testing was challenging to varying degrees in over half of countries. Main oral medications and botulinum toxin were available in all countries. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was easily accessible in one-third of the countries. Dystonia research was conducted in 20/24 countries. Trainings on dystonia for general practitioners (GPs) were available in 11/24 countries. However, lack of trainings for other professionals was almost general. For pediatric dystonia, experts and specific training were available in over half of the countries. Conclusions In this overview, we present the current state of dystonia management within ERN-RND. Management has slightly improved since 2016 in several fields, including diagnostics, availability of DBS, and research. The results highlight that future challenges in dystonia management are accessibility of experts, and diagnostic tools and treatments, education on adult and childhood dystonia, and optimization of referral pathways. These findings are important for improving dystonia care across Europe.

Purpose of review The aim of this review is to showcase the recent developments in the field of diagnosis and treatment of adult-onset focal dystonia. Recent findings Accurate phenotyping of focal dystonia is essential in the process of finding an underlying cause, including acquired, genetic, and idiopathic causes. Motor symptoms as well as the associated nonmotor symptoms and their detrimental impact on quality of life have received increased interest over the last years. The diagnostic process is complicated by the steadily increasing numbers of newly discovered genes associated with dystonia. Recent efforts have been aimed at further developing recommendations and algorithms to aid in diagnosis and in navigating the use of diagnostic tools. In terms of treatment, research on DBS is advancing towards a better understanding of the most effective stimulation locations within the globus pallidus. Moreover, with the introduction of the LFP-recording devices, the search continues for an accurate electrophysiological biomarker for dystonia. Summary Accurate phenotyping and (sub)classification of patients with dystonia is important for improving diagnosis, subsequent treatment effect and population-based study outcomes in research. Medical practitioners should be attentive to the presence of nonmotor symptoms in dystonia.