The conventional cytology rate for identification of neoplastic cells in effusions is about 60%. The rate of diagnostically equivocal effusions in routine cytology is dependent on the volume of effusion examined, type of preparation and staining, experience of the examiner, and application of ancillary methods. The aim of our study was to confirm the role of image cytometry analysis (DNA-ploidy) on pleural effusions. In this retrospective study based on 42 available cases with a histological diagnosis, we have examined 13 reactive mesothelial proliferations and 29 cases of malignant tumors (adenocarcinoma [ACA] or mesothelioma). The smears collected were submitted to the image analysis following a-three step protocol (smears stained with the Papanicolaou method were destained and then restained with Feulgen staining and finally analysed using image analysis cytometry). The results have shown that nonmalignant cases (reactive mesothelial proliferation) were all diploid and in contrast all aneuploid cases corresponded to malignant tumors. Only three mesotheliomas showed a diploid profile. In conclusion, these results confirm data from literature and indicate that cytometric analysis of nuclear content is a useful marker for identification of malignant cells in equivocal effusions and can be used to increase the cytological sensitivity in doubtful mesothelial proliferations.

Background: Differential diagnosis between hydropic abortion, partial mole and complete mole is still a challenge for pathologists but really important for patient management.

No abstract

This analysis of DNA‐ploidy heterogeneity in advanced gastric carcinomas is consistent with the hypothesis of the emergence of a single aneuploid cell clone as a crucial mechanism in the progression from early gastric carcinoma to advanced gastric cancer. The prognostic value of DNA‐ploidy in gastric cancers has been a matter of controversy. Tumour DNA‐ploidy heterogeneity, the presence within the same tumour of multiple stemlines differing in DNA content, has been described in various tumours including gastric cancers. The occurrence of such heterogeneity has been accepted as an explanation for the divergent DNA‐ploidy results in this type of tumours. A previous study of early gastric cancers suggested that in pure diploid superficial carcinomas, genetic instability might lead to a cell clone which has undergone a ploidy shift and is more aggressive. If so, this would initially result in DNA‐ploidy heterogeneity. Proliferative dominance of the aneuploid clone could eventually evolve to a homogeneous aneuploid tumour. In order to test this hypothesis, we studied DNA‐aneuploidy and DNA‐ploidy heterogeneity in advanced gastric carcinomas. We performed DNA cytophotometry on multiple samples collected from 16 advanced gastric carcinomas and found 15 DNA‐aneuploid tumours (94%) and one diploid tumour. Multiple DNA‐stemlines were found in 4 cases (26%). Analysis of proliferative activity performed on the same samples revealed higher proliferation rate in DNA‐ploidy homogeneous tumours than in aneuploid heterogeneous tumours. Heterogeneous tumours did not overexpress p53. These results confirm that DNA‐aneuploidy is frequent in advanced gastric cancer and demonstrate that a majority of these aneuploid tumours are not DNA‐ploidy heterogeneous. Furthermore, the higher proliferative activity in homogeneous‐aneuploid carcinomas and their more frequent overexpression of p53 support the hypothesis that in gastric cancer tumour progression implies the development of a dominant and more aggressive (higher proliferative activity, p53 overexpression) aneuploid cell clone.

Background: Cytologic evaluation of the biliary tract strictures is nowadays widely used for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions but remains a challenge for some problematic cases. Digital Image cytometry (DNA-cytometry) helps cytopathologists to resolve some unclear situations.Methods: We have analysed 41 specimens of bile duct brushings obtained from patients during ERCP (11 benign cases, 7 suspicious for malignancy cases and 23 malignant cases) by DNA-cytometry and correlated them with the histological biopsy counterpart.Results: All eleven cytological and histological benign cases were DNA-diploid and among 22 patients with malignant cytological and histological diagnosis 21 were DNA-aneuploid. One case considered malignant by the cytopathologist revealed DNA-aneuploid but malignancy could not be confirmed by histology. The analysis of the suspicious for malignancy cases revealed that all DNA-aneuploid cases were malignant and all DNA-diploid cases were benign referring to the follow-up of the patients.The comparison between cytology alone and cytology combined with DNA-cytometry related to the histological diagnosis (gold standard) resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 79% for cytology alone; a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity 92% for DNA-cytometry and a specificity of 93% and a sensitivity of 100% with combined analyses. The positive predictive value was 90% for cytology, 96% for DNA-cytometry and for both analyses. The negative predictive value showed 100% for cytology, 89% for DNA-cytometry and 100% for combined studies.Conclusions: Despite the limited number of patients involved in the study, the Results obtained indicate an increased of specificity and of positive predictive value using DNA-cytometry. These Results confirm the pertinence of these method for challenging cases, in conjunction with other available diagnostic tools.