Results of acute pulmonary vasodilator testing (AVT) and the outcome of medical therapy have not been described in patients with segmental pulmonary vascular disease (SPVD). We sought to compare the pulmonary vasodilatory effects of oxygen, oxygen with nitric oxide, and diltiazem, and to describe the clinical course of patients with SPVD and pulmonary hypertension. A retrospective review of 16 patients with pulmonary hypertension and SPVD involving 2-3 major lung segments who underwent AVT between January 2000 and December 2015 was performed. Baseline hemodynamic measurements were obtained with patients breathing ≤ 30% oxygen. AVT was performed using 100% oxygen, 100% oxygen with 20 ppm nitric oxide, 21-35% oxygen, and 21-35% oxygen with intravenous diltiazem. The events associated with their long-term care were described. Nine of 16 patients were acutely responsive during AVT using the Sitbon criteria. The change in mean pulmonary artery pressure with oxygen or oxygen with nitric oxide (19 ± 12 mmHg) was significantly greater than the change with diltiazem (7 ± 5 mmHg). Pulmonary vasodilator therapy was initiated or escalated after AVT in 12 patients. Five patients subsequently experienced a decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure or normalization in B-type natriuretic peptide. Three patients experienced adverse events associated with therapy. The actuarial survival was 94% over a period of 1-20 years. This study suggests that AVT can be used to identify patients with SPVD who are reactive to oxygen, oxygen with nitric oxide, and diltiazem. Clinical improvement was temporally associated with pulmonary vasodilator therapy in some patients with few adverse effects.
IntroductionRiociguat, an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, has been approved for use in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. However, there is limited data on its therapeutic use in children.Case PresentationWe report the case of two infants with severe suprasystemic pulmonary hypertension who were successfully treated with riociguat after failure to wean off inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) despite combination PAH therapy. Case 1 is a 6-month-old term male with TBX4 deletion who presented with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure and severe PAH immediately after birth. Initial cardiac catheterization showed PVRi 15.5 WU*m2. Marked hypoxemia and PAH persisted despite aggressive therapy with sildenafil, bosentan, intravenous treprostinil, and milrinone. The infant required high doses of inhaled nitric oxide (60 ppm) and manifested significant post-ductal hypoxemia and hemodynamic instability with any attempt at weaning. After discontinuation of sildenafil, initiation, and very slow uptitration of riociguat, the patient was able to maintain hemodynamic stability and wean from nitric oxide over 6 weeks with persistently severe but not worsened pulmonary hypertension. Case 2 is a 4-month-old term male with compound heterozygous SLC25A26 mutation and severe pulmonary hypertension. Initial cardiac catheterization showed PVRi 28.2 WU*m2. After uptitration of sildenafil, bosentan, and IV treprostinil, serial echocardiograms continued to demonstrate near-systemic pulmonary hypertension. He failed multiple attempts to wean off typical doses of iNO (10–20 ppm) over the following weeks with tachypnea, hypoxemia, and worsening pulmonary hypertension on echocardiogram despite continued aggressive combination targeted therapy. After a 24-h sildenafil washout, he was initiated and uptitrated on riociguat with concomitant, successful wean of nitric oxide over one week that was well tolerated. No serious adverse effects in the titration period were observed.ConclusionRiociguat may be considered as an adjuvant therapeutic agent in selected children with severe PAH who are poorly responsive to sildenafil therapy and unable to wean from iNO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.