Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the value of comprehensive nursing intervention in the perioperative period of ruptured bleeding of ectopic pregnancy.Methods: From January 2015 to January 2020, 164 patients with rupture and bleeding of ectopic pregnancy who needed laparoscopic treatment in the department of gynecology at our hospital were selected and randomly divided into the basic nursing group and the comprehensive nursing group, with 82 cases each.During the perioperative period, comprehensive nursing intervention or basic nursing intervention were performed, and the nursing effects of the two nursing interventions were compared. Results:The disappearance time of abdominal pain, the time to get out of bed, and the length of hospitalization in the comprehensive nursing group were significantly shorter than those in the basic nursing group (P<0.05). After surgery, blood sugar levels, aldosterone, cortisol, C-reactive protein (CRP), and IL-6 in the two groups were significantly higher than those before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). After the operation, the proportion of patients with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of 7-10 in the comprehensive nursing group was significantly lower than that in the basic nursing group (P<0.05). Before the intervention, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores of the two groups were compared, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After the intervention, the HAMA and HAMD scores of the comprehensive nursing group were significantly lower than those of the basic nursing group (P<0.05). The fallopian tube recanalization rate of patients in the comprehensive care group was significantly higher than that of the basic care group (P<0.05), and the complication rate was significantly lower than that of the basic care group (P<0.05).Conclusions: In summary, a comprehensive nursing program during the perioperative period can improve the treatment effect and significantly shorten the recovery time of patients, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of infection prevention care on the drainage of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) by indwelling Central venous catheterization (CVC).Methods: From January 2016 to January 2018, 128 patients at our hospital who needed indwelling CVC for drainage of MPE were randomly divided into an infection prevention group and a conventional group.The corresponding nursing plan was given to compare the 2 groups in several measures, including nursing effect and complications.Results: After intervention, the total effective rate of the infection prevention group was 96.88%, while the total effective rate of the conventional group was 87.50%, which was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The disappearance time of pleural effusion, catheter indwelling time, and length of stay in the infection prevention group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). The incidence of infection and the total incidence of all complications in the infection prevention group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). The proportion of the number of cases with Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≤10 in the infection prevention group was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P<0.05).Conclusions: As infection prevention care significantly improves clinical efficacy and reduces the occurrence of complications, it uses in clinic is warranted.