Beverage color significantly affects perceived sensory quality and consumer preference. Although the color of coffee beans is well known to vary strongly with roast level, little work has examined how roast level and brewing conditions affect the color of the final beverage. Here, we report that the color of full immersion brewed coffee is significantly affected by both roast level and brewing temperature. Coffees from three different origins were each roasted to three different levels (light, medium, and dark) and then brewed at three different temperatures (4, 22, and 92°C). Each sample was brewed toward full extraction and then diluted to precisely 2% total dissolved solids so that differences in concentration would not confound color measurements. Absorbance spectra (UV‐vis) and color tristimulus values (L*a*b*) were then collected and analyzed. We find that roast level had the strongest impact on brew color, and that brew temperature had a significant impact on color for light and medium roasts, with less impact on dark roasts. Qualitatively, the cold brewed coffees tended to be redder, while the hot brewed coffees were blacker. The results suggest that there is an opportunity to manipulate and brand brewed coffee color through judicious choices of roast level and brewing temperature. Practical Application Color serves as an indicator of coffee quality and potentially could affect perceived sensory characteristics. Our results suggest that appropriate control of roast level and brew temperature could yield desired colors for novel coffee products.

Cold brew coffee is often described as sweeter or less acidic than hot brew coffee. Such comparisons, however, are potentially confounded by two key effects: different brew temperatures necessarily change the extraction dynamics and potentially alter the resulting brew strength, and different consumption temperatures are well known to affect perceived flavor and taste. Here, we performed a systematic study of how extraction temperature affects the sensory qualities of full immersion coffee. The investigation used a 3 × 3 × 3 factorial design, with coffee from three different origins representing different post-harvest methods (washed, honey-processed, and wet-hulled), each roasted to three different levels (light, medium, and dark), and each brewed at three different temperatures (4 °C, 22 °C, and 92 °C). All coffees were brewed to equilibrium, then diluted to precisely 2% total dissolved solids (TDS) and served at the same cold temperature (4 °C). We find that four attributes exhibited statistically significant variations with brew temperature for all origins and roast levels tested, with bitter taste, sour taste, and rubber flavor all higher in hot brewed coffees, and floral flavor higher in cold brewed coffee. However, there were strong interactions with origin and roast, with several additional attributes significantly impacted by temperature for specific origins and roast levels. These results provide insight on how brew temperature can be used to modulate the flavor profile of full immersion coffee.

During wildfires large amounts of volatile phenols (VP’s) are released into the air from wood burning. These compounds absorb through the berry skin, where they are quickly glycosylated. Studies have shown that both the free and bound volatile phenols contribute to smoke taint perception. For grape smoke exposure risk assessment, both the natural amount of free and bound VP’s in grapes (baseline) as well as rejection threshold levels of these compounds in different wine matrixes need to be determined. In the current study the sensory attributes of different smoke impacted and non-smoke impacted wines from the same sites were determined by descriptive analysis. Multivariate statistics were used to relate smoke-related sensory attributes to smoke marker compounds. Subsequently, wines with different levels of smoke marker compounds were made by serial dilution of a smoke impacted wine with its respective non-impacted wine. A consumer study was conducted to determine the change in ‘liking’ for a wine depending on the percentage inclusion of smoke impacted wine. Rejection threshold levels of smoke marker compounds in red wine matrixes were determined by linking ‘liking’ scores to specific wine attributes. This is the first step in creating clear guidelines for wine smoke taint risk assessment.

The classic Coffee Brewing Control Chart (BCC) was originally developed in the 1950s. It relates coffee quality to brew strength and extraction yield, and it is still widely used today by coffee industry professionals around the world to provide guidance on the brewing of coffee. Despite its popularity, recent experimental studies have revealed that sensory attributes and consumer preferences actually follow much more complicated trends than those indicated by the classic BCC. Here, we present a methodology to synthesize the results of these recent studies on drip-brewed coffee to generate new versions of the BCC: a new Sensory BCC that displays a broad array of statistically significant sensory attributes across typical total dissolved solids and percent extraction ranges, a new Consumer BCC that highlights the existence of two preference clusters with different likes and dislikes across those ranges, a new Sensory and Consumer BCC that combines both sensory descriptive and consumer preferences on the same chart, and a more streamlined BCC that omits consumer preferences and focuses on the overarching sensory descriptive trends. The new BCCs provide more accurate insight on how best to brew coffee to achieve desired sensory profiles.

Background Coffee quality is believed to degrade quickly after brewing, and retail establishments discard unsold brewed coffee after a specified holding time period, sometimes as short as 30 min. We used trained sensory panels to evaluate the flavor profiles of light, medium, and dark roast coffees held in three different carafe types (glass on hot plate, thermal jacket, and vacuum insulated) for times ranging from 15 min to 3 h. Furthermore, a panel of 93 coffee‐industry professionals performed a blind evaluation of fresh (30 min) versus held (180 min) coffee for overall liking and attribute level adequacy. Results Sourness increased over time, consistent with acidity increasing over time (i.e., higher titratable acidity, lower pH), but only for the light and medium roasts. Dark roasted coffee became significantly more acidic over 3 h post‐brew but was not perceived as more sour over time by the sensory panel. Variations were observed between the thermal jacket and vacuum carafes for the light and dark roast, but few differences were observed with storage type in the medium roast. Surprisingly, the panel of coffee industry professionals showed no preference for fresh over held. Conclusions More sensory attributes decreased than increased over time, suggesting that the primary concern with loss of quality during coffee holding may be the loss of volatile aroma compounds. Hedonic ratings suggest that even if the changes over time are noticeable, they may not negatively impact overall liking. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.