Now-a-days most software projects have more candidate requirements. So it is vital for software companies to use different prioritization techniques to select valuable requirements among the candidate requirements. But software companies usually face a lot of challenges in using AHP such as increase in time and complexity with respect to number of comparisons. In this paper, we present previous work carried out in this research area and industrial study to identify the challenges software companies face while prioritizing large number of requirements using AHP. Different types of prioritization techniques have been developed to resolve these challenges. This paper focus on Numeral assignment technique which groups requirements into three categories: critical, standard and optional and AHP which prioritize requirements based on pair-wise comparisons. In this article we proposed a model i.e., NAcAHP where in which pair-wise comparison of AHP is applied on critical group of Numeral assignment technique for prioritizing the requirements. The result shows that the proposed model minimizes the time and complexity of pair wise comparison.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.