These results demonstrate that acidic preconditioning greatly increases ECFC-mediated angiogenesis in vitro including ECFC proliferation, tubulogenesis and SDF1-driven chemotaxis and is a positive regulator of microvessel formation in vivo.
The value of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of 24 severely Rh-sensitized pregnant women was studied. IVIG was infused at a daily dose of 0.4 g/kg maternal body weight for 4-5 consecutive days, and was administered again 15-21 days later until delivery, depending on the evolution of the hemolytic disease. Our population was divided into 3 groups according to the time of onset of therapy: group 1 (n = 8), before 20 weeks’ gestation; group 2 (n = 7), 20-28 weeks, and group 3 (n = 9), after 28 weeks. Initial mean anti-D level was significantly higher in group 1 (25.9 ± 12.9 IU/ml) than in the other 2 groups, whose mean values were, however, higher than 10 IU/ml. Amniotic-fluid total bilirubin levels before the onset of therapy were pathologic, and in 55% of the cases they coincided with zone 3 of Liley’s chart. Hydrops fetalis at the onset of treatment accounted for the only 3 fetal deaths in groups 1 and 2. None of the fetuses developed hydrops during treatment. Six of the 9 neonates in group 3 were depressed at birth (1-min Apgar below 7). However, at 5 min only 1 newborn showed an Apgar below 7. Mean birth weight was over 2,500 g in all the cases. Neonatal hematological condition in group 2 (50% of the babies required only phototherapy) was better than in the other 2 groups (transfusional therapy). There was a significant fall in maternal anti-D titers and intrauterine hemolysis after IVIG treatment. In order to further evaluate the response to IVIG therapy, the 13 cases in our population with a history of fetal/neonatal death in the previous pregnancy were analyzed separately. The results obtained in this particular group of patients demonstrated again the effectiveness of IVIG treatment.
Conclusions: There were no adverse effects on the mother or fetus, and there was no need for neonatal intensive care. Results were more favorable if treatment was started before 28 weeks’ gestation in nonhydropic fetuses.
Intrauterine fetal transfusion is currently the therapy of choice in cases of severe anti-D isoimmunisation. However, its efficacy is reduced in patients with early severe hydrops fetalis due to the technical difficulties in performing this procedure before 20 weeks' gestation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether early onset of high-dose gammaglobulin therapy followed by intrauterine transfusions (IUTs) is more effective than IUTs alone in the treatment of very severe isoimmunised fetuses. The population studied in this retrospective clinical research was assigned to one of the following two groups: 1) Gamma group: 30 patients receiving gammaglobulin therapy before 21 weeks' gestation and IUTs after 20 weeks; or 2) IUT group: 39 patients receiving IUT treatment starting at a gestational age of 20-25 weeks. Both groups were statistically similar regarding history of perinatal deaths and anti-D antibody titers. The number of hydropic fetuses at the first IUT and of fetal deaths were significantly higher in the IUT than in the Gamma group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in fetal hematocrit at first IUT and at birth. However, the percentage of severely anemic fetuses was higher in the IUT group. Fetal mortality rate was 36% less in the Gamma group. Our results suggest that high-dose gammaglobulin therapy followed by IUTs may improve fetal survival in these severe cases. Further randomised clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.