The rapid development of multiple high-throughput sequencing technologies has made it possible to explore the critical roles and mechanisms of functional enhancers and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs). The inflammatory immune response, as a fundamental pathological process in infectious diseases, cancers and immune disorders, coordinates the balance between the internal and external environment of the organism. It has been shown that both active enhancers and intranuclear eRNAs are preferentially expressed over inflammation-related genes in response to inflammatory stimuli, suggesting that enhancer transcription events and their products influence the expression and function of inflammatory genes. Therefore, in this review, we summarize and discuss the relevant inflammatory roles and regulatory mechanisms of eRNAs in inflammatory immune cells, non-inflammatory immune cells, inflammatory immune diseases and tumors, and explore the potential therapeutic effects of enhancer inhibitors affecting eRNA production for diseases with inflammatory immune responses.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to identify and validate urine exosomal AMACR (UE-A) as a novel biomarker to improve the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (Gleason score ≥ 7) at initial prostate biopsy.MethodsA total of 289 first-catch urine samples after the digital rectal exam (DRE) were collected from patients who underwent prostatic biopsy, and 17 patients were excluded due to incomplete clinical information. Urine exosomes were purified, and urinary exosomal AMACR (UE-A) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The diagnostic performance of UE-A was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), and waterfall plots.ResultsThe expression of AMACR in PCa and csPCa was significantly higher than that in BPH and non-aggressive (p < 0.001). The UE-A presented good performance in distinguishing PCa from BPH or BPH plus non-significant PCa (nsPCa) from csPCa with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.832 and 0.78, respectively. The performance of UE-A was further validated in a multi-center cohort of patients with an AUC of 0.800 for detecting PCa and 0.749 for detecting csPCa. The clinical utility assessed by DCA showed that the benefit of patients using UE-A was superior to PSA, f/t PSA, and PSAD in both the training cohort and the validation cohort in terms of all threshold probabilities. Setting 95% sensitivity as the cutoff value, UE-A could avoid 27.57% of unnecessary biopsies, with only 4 (1.47%) csPCa patients missed.ConclusionsWe demonstrated the great performance of UE-A for the early diagnosis of PCa and csPCa. UE-A could be a novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarker to improve the detection of PCa and csPCa.

No abstract