No abstract

Introduction: We aimed to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2 irrigants routinely used in root canal therapy of permanent teeth. Methods: Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched for randomized controlled trials published until March 2020. The meta-analysis of relative risk (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) was performed using a random effects model with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed for culture and molecular methods of bacterial detection. Results: The literature search yielded 2110 records without duplicates. Eight studies were eligible for a systematic review. No significant differences in the incidence of samples with positive bacterial growth after irrigation (RR 5 1.003; 95% CI, 0.729-1.380; P 5 .987) and mean bacterial number changes (SMD 5 0.311; 95% CI, 20.368 to 0.991; P 5 .369) were observed between CHX and NaOCl in the culture and molecular subgroups. Heterogeneity in RR (I 2 5 0.000%, P 5 .673) was low among studies, whereas considerable heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of SMD (I 2 5 76.336%, P 5 .005). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that both CHX and NaOCl irrigation can reduce bacterial infections without any significant difference in antimicrobial efficacy between them, despite their difference in molecular mechanisms. Therefore, each can be used as the main antibacterial root canal irrigant. However, our results were limited by inconsistencies among retrieved articles and a lack of clinically relevant outcomes. Further well-designed clinical studies are warranted to supplement our results.

BackgroundC-reactive protein level (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) have been variably used in clinical trials on acute pancreatitis (AP). We assessed their potential role.MethodsFirst, we investigated studies which have used CRP or WBC, to describe their current role in trials on AP. Second, we extracted the data of 1435 episodes of AP from our registry. CRP and WBC on admission, within 24 h from the onset of pain and their highest values were analyzed. Descriptive statistical tools as Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, Levene’s F tests, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and AUC (Area Under the Curve) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were performed.ResultsOur literature review showed extreme variability of CRP used as an inclusion criterion or as a primary outcome or both in past and current trials on AP. In our cohort, CRP levels on admission poorly predicted mortality and severe cases of AP; AUC: 0.669 (CI:0.569–0.770); AUC:0.681 (CI: 0.601–0.761), respectively. CRP levels measured within 24 h from the onset of pain failed to predict mortality or severity; AUC: 0.741 (CI:0.627–0.854); AUC:0.690 (CI:0.586–0.793), respectively. The highest CRP during hospitalization had equally poor predictive accuracy for mortality and severity AUC:0.656 (CI:0.544–0.768); AUC:0.705 (CI:0.640–0.769) respectively. CRP within 24 h from the onset of pain used as an inclusion criterion markedly increased the combined event rate of mortality and severe AP (13% for CRP > 25 mg/l and 28% for CRP > 200 mg/l).ConclusionCRP within 24 h from the onset of pain as an inclusion criterion elevates event rates and reduces the number of patients required in trials on AP.

Background: The rising prevalence of cirrhotic cases related to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis has led to an increased number of cirrhotic patients with coexistence of obesity and muscle mass loss, known as sarcopenic obesity (SO). In patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT), the presence of SO may worsen prognosis, and increase morbidity and mortality.Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of the presence of pre-transplant SO on the outcomes of LT.Methods: A comprehensive search was performed in seven medical databases for studies comparing morbidity and mortality of patients with and without SO after LT. The primary outcome was overall mortality in the short- (1 year), intermediate- (3 years), and long- (5 years) term. We calculated pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was quantified with I2-statistics.Results: Based on the analysis of 1,515 patients from three articles, SO increased overall mortality compared to non-SO at short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-up (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.28-3.33; RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10-2.51; and RR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.10-3.93, respectively) without significant between-study heterogeneity for the short- and intermediate- term (I2 = 0.0% for both) and considerable heterogeneity for long-term follow-up (I2 = 81.1%).Conclusion: Pre-transplant SO proved to be a risk factor after LT and was associated with two times higher mortality at short- and long- term follow-up. Since SO worsens the prognosis of patients after LT, the inclusion of body composition assessment before LT may help to plan a more individualized nutritional treatment, physiotherapy, and postoperative care and may improve morbidity and mortality.

Objectives To assess the histomorphometric outcomes obtained in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with different biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA). Materials and Methods A search of the existing medical literature until October 1, 2019, was performed. Inclusion criteria were (a) RCTs assessing a two‐stage MSA from the lateral approach using autologous bone or biomaterials for grafting and (b) reported histomorphometric outcomes based on crestal bone core biopsy samples. The Bayesian method was used to perform pairwise meta‐analyses and network meta‐analysis (NMA). The primary outcome, the new bone percentage (NB %), was calculated as mean differences with 95% credible intervals. The interventions were ranked by their posterior probability by calculating the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. Results Thirty‐four RCTs (842 MSAs) were included in the analysis with a normal healing period (5–8 months). All comparisons were presented in a league table. On the basis of the ranking probability, the most effective bone grafting material for NB% was bovine xenograft + bone marrow concentrate (BMC) (81%), followed by bovine xenograft + platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) (77%), bioactive glass ceramic + autologous bone 1:1 (70%), nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in silica gel (70%), and bioactive glass ceramic (70%). Autologous bone graft alone took the twelfth position with 57%. Conclusion Within the limitations of the present NMA, the analysis did not confirm autologous bone alone as the gold standard for MSA and showed superiority of composite grafts such as bovine xenograft + BMC after 5–8 months of healing.