: Pre-emergence activity of pendimethalin on propanil-resistant jungle rice (Echinochloa colona) was demonstrated in glasshouse trials. Both susceptible and resistant populations, collected from Costa Rica, were controlled by 1É25 kg ha~1, the usual application rate used in the Ðeld where Rottboellia cochinchinensis is also a problem. When applied post-emergence, propanil performance was improved by the addition of low doses of pendimethalin to the herbicide mixture. A propanil-resistant selection was controlled by 0É23 kg ha~1 pendimethalin ] 0É54 kg ha~1 propanil at the one-to-two leaf stage, and 0É23 kg ha~1 pendimethalin ] 1É08 kg propanil at the three-to-four leaf stage compared to 1É08 kg and 2É16 kg ha~1 respectively when propanil was applied alone. This suggests that pendimethalin improves post-emergence control in the Ðeld compared to the standard propanil treatment and can provide residual preemergence control of late-germinating individuals, so reducing the propanil selection pressure. For e †ective jungle rice control, growers apply propanil (3É84 kg ha~1) at 10 and 20 days after planting (DAP) followed by one application of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl (0É045 kg ha~1) at 35 DAP. Field experiments, conducted in dry-seeded upland rice in southern Costa Rica, demonstrated that under high jungle-rice population pressure, one application of pendimethalin at 1É5 kg ha~1 provided an e †ective replacement for propanil, resulting in reduced weed-control costs.
Field experiments were conducted at four locations in the Central Pacific region of Costa Rica between 1994 and 1996 to determine suitable tactics for integrated control of propanil-resistant junglerice in rain-fed rice. Stubble incorporation within 3 mo after rice harvest did not affect the density of junglerice that emerged with the crop at the beginning of the rainy season at any location. However, the elimination with glyphosate of the first junglerice seedling population emerging before rice planting consistently reduced the in-crop infestation of junglerice and resulted in increased grain yields. The positive effect of eliminating the first junglerice flush remained even after the in-crop treatments were applied and lasted after rice harvest. Substitution of the two customary applications of propanil (3.8 kg ha−1 each) with a single application of pendimethalin (0.75 to 1.5 kg ha−1), preemergence or early postemergence, also reduced junglerice infestation and improved grain yield. Both propanil, in mixture with the synergist piperophos, and quinclorac controlled propanil-resistant junglerice and increased grain yields. Control of the initial junglerice population and improved in-crop weed management can serve as the basis for integrated management of herbicide-resistant junglerice in rain-fed rice.
Eight common polymorphisms of known myocardial infarction (MI) risk factors (factor V Leiden (FVL), factor V HR2 (FVHR2), factor II 20210G>A (FII), factor VII IVS7 (FVII IVS7), factor VII Arg353Gln (FVII), factor XIII Val34Leu (FXIII), Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR), Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE)) and environmental risk factors were analyzed in a MI patients of Costa Rica. This case-control study included 186 MI subjects, 95 of them < 45 years and 201 age and sex matched controls. With the use of PCR method the polymorphisms were detected and through interviews additional information was collected. Hypercholesterolemia and smoking were associated with a significant risk in younger patients. High fibrinogen level was an important risk factor and interaction with smoking was detected. Mainly, the genotype 34LeuLeu of FXIII showed significant protective effect, (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.13-0.80) while the other polymorphisms showed no significant difference between the cases and the controls. Carriers of FVII (OR 2.75, 95%CI 1.07-7.02) and FXIII (OR 4.20, 95%CI 2.03-8.67) polymorphisms showed interaction with fibrinogen in the statistical analysis. It was concluded that there was an important interaction between the common risk factors and the polymorphisms (FVII; FXIII) in the development of MI. This is one of the first reports in a Latin-American population dealing with these molecular markers and MI.
Bromacil was introduced at the beginning of the 1960s for PRE and early POST control of grasses and broadleaf weeds, particularly in citrus (Rutaceae spp.) orchards and pineapple [Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.] plantations as well as in noncultivated areas. Both the acidic form of bromacil and its lithium salt are highly soluble in water; the herbicide is moderately to highly persistent in the soil with a half-life from 60 d to 8 mo and is prone to percolate in the soil and reach groundwater. In Costa Rica, bromacil was registered for both citrus and pineapple, but in recent years its major use has been in pineapple. An average of 60,000 kg of active bromacil per year were imported before its banning in 2017. Pineapple is grown in more than 40,000 ha; the recommended rate of bromacil was 1.6 to 3.2 kg ha−1. In a survey conducted by the National University between 2001 and 2004, bromacil was the most frequently found pesticide, at levels between 0.5 and 20 µg L−1, in water springs and wells in the pineapple-growing area of the Caribbean side of Costa Rica. Further studies conducted more recently also documented the presence of bromacil in the ground and surface water in areas where pineapple is planted. The local standard for the quality of drinking water of 2015 established maximum acceptable values of 0.1 µg L−1 and 0.5 µg L−1 for a single pesticide and for the sum of all pesticides present, respectively, but it was amended for bromacil to comply with requirements determined by the Constitutional Court to “non-detectable by method.” This paper provides an account of the scientific and administrative considerations for the banning of bromacil that occurred on May 24, 2017.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.