Objectives:We examined the long-term maintenance of treatment outcomes in patients with acquired brain injuries who participated in community-based neuropsychological rehabilitation (NR) programs, in a prospective, within-subject, longitudinal, partial double-blind cohort study.Methods:One hundred forty-three patients (39 females, mean age 33.5 years) who had experienced a brain injury (BI) (mean time since injury 3.95 years) were referred to a postacute community-based NR institute. Patients participated in one of the three programs aimed at improving their functional outcome: comprehensive–holistic neuropsychological rehabilitation, vocational-focused neuropsychological rehabilitation, and individual neuropsychological rehabilitation. Self-reported data regarding employment, community integration, perceived quality of life (PQoL), and mood were collected at program start and end, and annually for 3 years post program completion. Group placement was based on clinical considerations, such that the study did not aim to compare the programs, but rather to assess their long-term benefits.Results:Employment status and stability, community integration, and PQoL improved significantly after program completion and continued to improve for the following 3 years. The proportion of individuals with mood disturbances did not change during or after the programs.Conclusions:A clear consensus regarding BI rehabilitation is that long-term maintenance of treatment outcomes is imperative to its efficacy. Our findings suggest that postacute NR programs provide participants with various tools, skills, and psychological perspectives that they continue to gain from and generalize to real life after program completion, reflecting transformational processes with stable long-term benefits.

At the group level, community-based neuropsychological rehabilitation interventions with a vocational focus are generally effective among individuals with brain injuries. However, individual participants vary significantly in the extent of their improvement, prompting attempts to elucidate individual, injury-related, and environmental factors affecting prognosis. In this study, we examined the relationships between one such factor – “time from injury” (the time between injury and intervention) – and two outcome measures: employment status and perceived quality of life (PQoL), in 157 brain injury survivors, before and after a holistic neuropsychological vocational rehabilitation program. We also examined whether relationships between the variables were moderated by age at onset of treatment and injury severity. In the entire sample, both the proportion of employed participants and average PQoL increased following program participation. Neither, time from injury, severity, nor age at onset of treatment predicted the increase in employment proportion, and severity was not a significant predictor of PQoL. However, an interactive effect indicated that when treatment was started at a younger age, longer time from injury predicted higher levels of PQoL, but when treatment was started at older ages, longer time from injury predicted lower levels of PQoL. When interpreted alongside existing literature, these results suggest that delaying vocational components of rehabilitation can be beneficial for younger participants, while the effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation can be maximized by starting as early as possible among older participants. Most importantly, regardless of age, it appears that vocational rehabilitation can be effective even when initiated many years after injury.