Background Penoscrotal edema is typically caused by lymphatic obstruction, which can have both primary and secondary causes. Studies describing congenital penoscrotal edema are rare. Surgery can be divided into two types: The first approach involves extensive removal of diseased tissue and tissue reconstruction. The second approach is removal of the lesions and creating additional lymphatic vascular anastomoses. Case presentation We present a case report of a 15-year-old patient with recurrent penoscrotal edema and swelling of both lower extremities. The literature were also reviewed to provide additional information. Physical examination revealed slow lymphatic reflux of the lower extremities and no obvious abnormalities in testicular morphology, bilaterally, or blood supply. Surgery was performed by excising the affected skin and subcutaneous tissue and the flaps was cut in the middle in Y shape to cover the penis and scrotum. Postoperative follow-up revealed wound integrity and patient satisfaction with the outcome. Conclusion Excision and reconstructive surgery are the primary treatments for penoscrotal edema. The majority of reported patients undergoing excision and reconstruction achieved satisfactory reshaping and improved their life quality. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-019-0456-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background The aim of this study was to compare the effects of nalbuphine and sufentanil on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract after laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancies. Methods A total of 100 patients aged between 18-70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II who scheduled for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either sufentanil (Group S) or nalbuphine (Group N) to receive either sufentanil (Group S) or nalbuphine (Group N) in the intraoperative and postoperative periods. The time to the first passage of flatus, the time to the first defecation, the time to the toleration of diet, the serum gastrin and the length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. Postoperative pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of PCA(patient-controlled analgesia)s, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and dizziness were compared between the groups. Results The time to the first passage of flatus(p =0.551), the time to the first defecation(p =0.310), the time to the toleration of diet(p =0.182), the serum gastrin(p =0.397), the number of postoperative nausea(p =0.920), vomit(p =0.334) and PCA events(p =0.167) and the length of hospital stay(p =0.482) were not significantly different between the two groups. VAS scores at postoperative 6 h(p=0.008), 12 h(p =0.002) and 24 h(p =0.013) were lower in Group N than in Group S. Conclusions Compared with sufentanil, nalbuphine was not associated with improved postoperative GI dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancies, but it was associated with reduced postoperative pain. Background Postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction such as nausea, vomiting, inability to eat, deflation, prolonged bowel movements, and paralytic ileus are some of the most common complications after surgery, and the incidence is nearly 10-30%(1). The occurrence of postoperative GI dysfunction leads

No abstract

Background The aim of this study was to compare the effects of nalbuphine and sufentanil on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract after laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancies. Methods A total of 100 patients aged between 18-70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II who scheduled for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either sufentanil (Group S) or nalbuphine (Group N) to receive either sufentanil (Group S) or nalbuphine (Group N) in the intraoperative and postoperative periods. The time to the first passage of flatus, the time to the first defecation, the time to the toleration of diet, the serum gastrin and the length of hospital stay were compared between the groups. Postoperative pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), the number of PCA(patient-controlled analgesia)s, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and dizziness were compared between the groups. Results The time to the first passage of flatus(p =0.551), the time to the first defecation(p =0.310), the time to the toleration of diet(p =0.182), the serum gastrin(p =0.397), the number of postoperative nausea(p =0.920), vomit(p =0.334) and PCA events(p =0.167) and the length of hospital stay(p =0.482) were not significantly different between the two groups. VAS scores at postoperative 6 h(p=0.008), 12 h(p =0.002) and 24 h(p =0.013) were lower in Group N than in Group S. Conclusions Compared with sufentanil, nalbuphine was not associated with improved postoperative GI dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gynecological malignancies, but it was associated with reduced postoperative pain.

No abstract