Background and Purpose-The use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) to treat coronary artery disease is now commonplace. The occurrence of microemboli during invasive procedures such as cardiac angiography and bypass surgery is well documented, although neurological complications are relatively uncommon. To date, no investigation has been undertaken of the frequency or nature of microemboli occurring during PTCA or of the correlation with aortic atheroma. Methods-Twenty patients having elective PTCA underwent examination by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) to detect left middle cerebral artery microemboli occurring during the procedure. Blinded off-line analysis correlated microembolic signal counts on TCD with the components of each stage of the PTCA. Patients later underwent transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography, with measurements made of the thickness of the intima and atheroma in the ascending and descending thoracic aortic arch by cardiologists blinded to the TCD results. Results-A total of 973 microembolic signals were detected (meanϮSD, 48.7Ϯ36.7 per patient); 196 (20%) occurred on movement of the PTCA catheter and wire around the aortic arch, 84 (9%) with other PTCA catheter-associated movements, and 679 (70%) in association with injection of solutions (eg, saline and contrast). Mean signal counts during contrast injection were significantly greater than during the other 3 phases (PϽ0.001). No neurological events occurred in the study. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward greater microembolic signal counts with the number of times the catheter was passed around the aortic arch and the amount of arch atheroma detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Conclusions-Microemboli detected on TCD are a common occurrence during PTCA but are largely asymptomatic. The majority of microembolic signals are most probably gaseous in origin and do not appear to be related to the extent of aortic atheroma or to clinical events.
Capillary malformations (CM) cause significant psychosocial complications. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment at 6-12-weekly intervals under general anaesthesia (GA) commencing in infants at 6 months of age remains the standard of care in order to achieve maximal improvement prior to school age. The safety of repeated GA in children is controversial. Shortening the time between treatments increases the number that can be delivered prior to 6 months of age, thus reducing the number of subsequent treatments needed under GA. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of more frequent PDL treatment of CM in infancy via a pilot, prospective patient-controlled study of 10 patients. Using 595 nm (Vbeam) PDL, the entire CM was treated initially, then half the CM randomly allocated to 2-weekly and half to 3-monthly intervals for two further treatments. Photographs of the CM taken 3 months after treatment completion were evaluated by an independent, blinded dermatologist. Nine infants completed the study. Three infants (33%) had more improvement on the 2-weekly treated side and four (44%) had more improvement on the 3-monthly treated side. Two patients (22%) showed no difference between sides. Treatments were well tolerated without complications. We conclude that 2-weekly PDL treatments of CM in infants aged under 6 months is effective and well tolerated without adverse effects. Our preliminary data suggest a possible superior efficacy with 3-monthly treatment intervals; however, larger studies are warranted for stronger evidence. More frequent non-GA treatment of CM in infants should be further investigated to decrease the risk of repeated GA exposure in young children.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.