BACKGROUND Understanding teachers' appraisals of student wellness services and supports during COVID‐19 is essential to strengthening services and improving student health outcomes. This mixed‐method study aimed to examine US PK‐12 teachers' appraisals of student wellness services and supports during COVID‐19. METHODS This study focuses on qualitative data from 291 teachers' open‐ended responses to the question: “What do you wish your school leaders knew about this (wellness support) aspect of your work?” and whose responses described wellness services and supports. A qualitative content analysis was conducted by an interdisciplinary research team using open‐ and axial coding. RESULTS Three main themes emerged. (1) insufficient access to mental health professionals and programming at schools, (2) concern about the quality of available services, and (3) a need for teacher professional development and support on student wellness. Statistically significant differences in teacher appraisals of insufficient access to mental health professionals and programming were found based on grade level taught and percentage of immigrant students in the school. CONCLUSION With amplified student wellness needs, school personnel, including school leaders, must consider ways to allocate additional resources/staffing, assess the quality of services and supports, and design professional development opportunities to support teachers' involvement in supporting student wellness needs.

Case‐centered teaching and learning is important for illustrating evaluation approaches, practicing professional problem‐solving and ethical decision‐making, and teaching professional skills and competencies. In this study we provide findings on a content analysis of 148 written cases used to teach evaluation and a critical analysis of five purposively selected cases. The findings demonstrate that evaluators have written many cases to teach the situational nature of evaluation practice. Most of the cases are simulations of practice, which include how the case actors’ think, decide, and act in an evaluation context. The study findings point to several areas for strengthening case‐centered teaching in evaluation, including providing clear learning objectives, developing supporting resources for instructors, aligning cases with professional competencies and/or core concepts in the field, developing cases to promote active and problem‐based learning, ensuring cases represent equity‐informed practices, and broadening the representation of diverse people and contexts.