The COVID-19 pandemic has caused strains on health systems worldwide disrupting routine hospital services for all non-COVID patients. Within this retrospective study, we analyzed inpatient hospital admissions across 18 German university hospitals during the 2020 lockdown period compared to 2018. Patients admitted to hospital between January 1 and May 31, 2020 and the corresponding periods in 2018 and 2019 were included in this study. Data derived from electronic health records were collected and analyzed using the data integration center infrastructure implemented in the university hospitals that are part of the four consortia funded by the German Medical Informatics Initiative. Admissions were grouped and counted by ICD 10 chapters and specific reasons for treatment at each site. Pooled aggregated data were centrally analyzed with descriptive statistics to compare absolute and relative differences between time periods of different years. The results illustrate how care process adoptions depended on the COVID-19 epidemiological situation and the criticality of the disease. Overall inpatient hospital admissions decreased by 35% in weeks 1 to 4 and by 30.3% in weeks 5 to 8 after the lockdown announcement compared to 2018. Even hospital admissions for critical care conditions such as malignant cancer treatments were reduced. We also noted a high reduction of emergency admissions such as myocardial infarction (38.7%), whereas the reduction in stroke admissions was smaller (19.6%). In contrast, we observed a considerable reduction in admissions for non-critical clinical situations, such as hysterectomies for benign tumors (78.8%) and hip replacements due to arthrosis (82.4%). In summary, our study shows that the university hospital admission rates in Germany were substantially reduced following the national COVID-19 lockdown. These included critical care or emergency conditions in which deferral is expected to impair clinical outcomes. Future studies are needed to delineate how appropriate medical care of critically ill patients can be maintained during a pandemic.

Interface dermatitis is a characteristic histological pattern that occurs in autoimmune and chronic inflammatory skin diseases. It is unknown whether a common mechanism orchestrates this distinct type of skin inflammation. Here we investigated the overlap of two different interface dermatitis positive skin diseases, lichen planus and lupus erythematosus. The shared transcriptome signature pointed toward a strong type I immune response, and biopsy-derived T cells were dominated by IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) positive cells. The transcriptome of keratinocytes stimulated with IFN-γ and TNF-α correlated significantly with the shared gene regulations of lichen planus and lupus erythematosus. IFN-γ, TNF-α, or mixed supernatant of lesional T cells induced signs of keratinocyte cell death in three-dimensional skin equivalents. We detected a significantly enhanced epidermal expression of receptor-interacting-protein-kinase 3, a key regulator of necroptosis, in interface dermatitis. Phosphorylation of receptor-interacting-protein-kinase 3 and mixed lineage kinase domain like pseudokinase was induced in keratinocytes on stimulation with T-cell supernatant-an effect that was dependent on the presence of either IFN-γ or TNF-α in the T-cell supernatant. Small hairpin RNA knockdown of receptor-interacting-protein-kinase 3 prevented cell death of keratinocytes on stimulation with IFN-γ or TNF-α. In conclusion, type I immunity is associated with lichen planus and lupus erythematosus and induces keratinocyte necroptosis. These two mechanisms are potentially involved in interface dermatitis.

Background:The COVID-19 pandemic exposes individuals to multiple stressors, such as quarantine, physical distancing, job loss, risk of infection, and loss of loved ones. Such a complex array of stressors potentially lead to symptoms of adjustment disorder. Objective: This cross-sectional exploratory study examined relationships between risk and protective factors, stressors, and symptoms of adjustment disorder during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Data from the first wave of the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS) longitudinal ADJUST Study were used. N = 15,563 participants aged 18 years and above were recruited in eleven countries (Austria,