Despite recent advances in perioperative support care, surgery for obstructive jaundice is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For this reason, preoperative percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTD) has been recommended for these patients. This method of management, however, has only been supported by retrospective and nonrandomized studies. Therefore, a prospective, randomized study was performed to determine the effect of preoperative PTD on operative mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, and hospital cost. Thirty-day mortality was 8.1% among 37 patients undergoing preoperative PTD, compared to 5.3% for 38 patients who went to surgery without preoperative drainage. Overall morbidity was also slightly, but not significantly, higher in patients who underwent preoperative PTD, (57% versus 53%). However, total hospital stay was significantly longer (p less than 0.005) in the PTD group (31.4 days versus 23.1 days). The cost of this excess hospitalization and the PTD procedure at our university medical center was over +8000 per patient. The authors conclude that preoperative PTD does not reduce operative risk but does increase hospital cost and, therefore, should not be performed routinely.
The purpose of this study to compare the long-term clinical outcome of early versus delayed rasagiline treatment in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Subjects (N = 404) were randomly assigned to initial treatment with rasagiline (early-start group) or placebo for 6 months followed by rasagiline (delayed-start group) in the TEMPO study. Subjects who chose to participate in an open-label extension (N = 306) continued to receive rasagiline as well as other PD medications as needed. Average (+/-SD) duration in the study was 3.6 +/- 2.1 years; 177 subjects received rasagiline for > or =5.0 years. Over the entire 6.5-year follow-up period, the adjusted mean difference in change from baseline in total UPDRS scores was 2.5 units (SE 1.1; P = 0.021) or 16% (SE 5.7; P = 0.006) in favor of the early-start versus delayed-start rasagiline group. Although the interaction between treatment and time was significant, values for the early-start group were better than the delayed-start group across all time points. Significantly less worsening (percent change) in total UPDRS scores was observed in the early-start group at the time points 0.5, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 years (P < 0.05). Compared to delayed start, early initiation of rasagiline provided long-term clinical benefit, even in the face of treatment with other dopaminergic agents. This might reflect enduring benefits due to neuroprotection or effects on compensatory mechanisms in early PD.
A retrospective study of 97 patients with proximal bile duct cancer treated at the University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center was conducted to determine the benefits of different operative treatments. Eighty-nine patients were divided into three treatment groups: Group I, curative resection (29 patients); Group II, palliative resection (13 patients) and bypasses (8 patients); and Group III, operative intubation (39 patients). Two patients died before operation and six patients were treated without operation by percutaneous biliary decompression. High morbidity rate (53.8%) and mortality rate (69.2%) were encountered in 13 patients who had hepatic resection. Survival rates of the three treatment groups were comparable. For the 64 patients closely monitored after discharge, quality of survival was assessed according to six parameters: frequency of hospitalization for cholangitis; catheter-related problems; the percentage of days hospitalized; duration of jaundice; antibiotic requirements; and analgesic needs. Group I patients had the best qualitative survival, whereas Group II patients had the worst result when compared with either Group I (p less than 0.001) or Group III (p less than 0.005). Curative resection is recommended when it can be done without a concomitant hepatic resection. When noncurable disease is found on examination, operative intubation after dilatation is the preferred palliative measure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.