Gamma‐hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) represents an important drug in clinical and forensic toxicology, particularly in the context of drug‐facilitated crimes. Analytically, GHB remains a major challenge given its endogenous occurrence and short detection window. Previous studies identified a number of potential interesting novel conjugates of GHB with carnitine, amino acids (AA, glutamate, glycine, and taurine), or fatty acids. As a basis for comprehensive studies on the suitability of these novel biomarkers, we developed and validated a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method in human urine. Additionally, already known markers 2,4‐dihydroxy butyric acid (2,4‐DHB), 3,4‐DHB, glycolic acid, succinic acid, succinylcarnitine, and GHB glucuronide were included. The method was fully validated according to (inter)national guidelines. Synthetic urine proved suitable as a surrogate matrix for calibration. Matrix effects were observed for all analytes with suppression effects of about 50% at QC LOW, and approximately 20% to 40% at QC HIGH, but with consistent standard deviation of <25% at QC LOW and <15% at QC HIGH, respectively. All analytes showed acceptable intra‐ and inter‐day imprecision of below 20%, except for inter‐day variation of GHB taurine and FA conjugates at the lowest QC. Preliminary applicability studies proved the usefulness of the method and pointed towards GHB glycine, followed by other AA conjugates as the most promising candidates to improve GHB detection. FA conjugates were not detected in urine samples yet. The method can be used now for comprehensive sample analysis on (controlled) GHB administration to prove the usefulness of the novel GHB biomarkers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.