Catheter-related bloodstream infection in extremely low-birth-weight infants requiring long-term central venous access was reduced by nearly half after the institution of a dedicated PICC team in the neonatal intensive care unit. Standardizing PICC line placement is important, but standardizing line maintenance is essential to improvement of CRBSI rates.

Cardiopulmonary monitors (CPMs) generate false alarm rates ranging from 85%-99% with few of these alarms actually representing serious clinical events. The overabundance of clinically insignificant alarms in hospitals desensitizes the clinician to true-positive alarms and poses significant safety issues. In this IRB-approved externally funded study, we sought to assess the clinical conditions associated with true and false-positive CPM alarms and attempted to define optimal alarm parameters that would reduce false-positive alarm rates (as they relate to clinically significant events) and thus improve overall CPM performance in critically ill children. Prior to the study, clinically significant events (CSEs) were defined and validated. Over a seven-month period in 2009, critically ill children underwent evaluation of CSEs while connected to a CPM. Comparative CPM and CSE data were analyzed with an aim to estimate sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for CSEs. CPM and CSE data were evaluated in 98 critically ill children. Overall, 2,245 high priority alarms were recorded with 68 CSEs noted in 45 observational days. During the course of the study, the team developed a firm understanding of CPM functionality, including the pitfalls associated with aggregation and analysis of CPM alarm data. The inability to capture all levels of CPM alarms represented a significant study challenge. Selective CPM data can be easily queried with standard reporting, however the default settings with this reporting exclude critical information necessary in compiling a coherent study denominator database. Although the association between CPM alarms and CSEs could not be comprehensively evaluated, preliminary analysis reflected poor CPM alarm specificity. This study provided the necessary considerations for the proper design of a future study that improves the positive predictive value of CPM alarms. In addition, this investigation has resulted in improved awareness of CPM alarm parameter settings and associated false-positive alarms. This information has been incorporated into nursing educational programs.

No abstract

Introduction: Despite the well-known dangers of working in the healthcare industry, healthcare organizations have historically accepted workplace injuries as business as usual. In 2017, Children’s National Hospital began our Employee and Staff Safety program to drive down the employee injury rate and address this disturbing industry trend. Methods: With guidance and support from executive leadership, we created an Employee and Staff Safety program that aligned employee safety work with existing patient safety and quality improvement efforts. Team leads collected and analyzed baseline employee injury data and identified areas of highest injuries. Dedicated subcommittees focused on five specific areas: slips, trips, and falls; sharps injuries; blood and body fluid exposures; verbal and physical violence; and overexertion injuries. Subcommittees established aims, identified key drivers, and brainstormed interventions for tests of change. Results: Because the inception of the Employee and Staff Safety program, Children’s National has seen significant reductions in our Days Away Restricted or Transfer (DART) rate. The DART rate shows a sustained 37% reduction since the baseline period of FY16–FY17 (1.48 injuries/200,000 h worked to 0.93 injuries/200,000 h worked). The regression trend shows a significant decrease (38.3%) in DART injuries, from 1.544 to 0.952 over 56 months; P = 0.016. Conclusions: Active leadership support and analyzing data on specific employee harm areas coupled with targeted interventions, helped improve Children’s National’s DART rate. The Employee and Staff Safety program’s success in utilizing patient safety and quality improvement tools creates a generalizable framework for other hospitals to advance their high-reliability journey.