We used intravenous arginine with measurements of insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon to examine β-cell and α-cell survival and function in a group of 10 chronic pancreatitis recipients 1–8 years after total pancreatectomy and autoislet transplantation. Insulin and C-peptide responses correlated robustly with the number of islets transplanted (correlation coefficients range 0.81–0.91; P < 0.01–0.001). Since a wide range of islets were transplanted, we normalized the insulin and C-peptide responses to the number of islets transplanted in each recipient for comparison with responses in normal subjects. No significant differences were observed in terms of magnitude and timing of hormone release in the two groups. Three recipients had a portion of the autoislets placed within their peritoneal cavities, which appeared to be functioning normally up to 7 years posttransplant. Glucagon responses to arginine were normally timed and normally suppressed by intravenous glucose infusion. These findings indicate that arginine stimulation testing may be a means of assessing the numbers of native islets available in autologous islet transplant candidates and is a means of following posttransplant α- and β-cell function and survival.
OBJECTIVEBecause direct adipose tissue free fatty acid (FFA) storage may contribute to body fat distribution, we measured FFA (palmitate) storage rates and fatty acid (FA) storage enzymes/proteins in omental and abdominal subcutaneous fat.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSElective surgery patients received a bolus of [1-14C]palmitate followed by omental and abdominal subcutaneous fat biopsies to measure direct FFA storage. Long chain acyl-CoA synthetase (ACS) and diacylglycerol acyltransferase activities, CD36, fatty acid-binding protein, and fatty acid transport protein 1 were measured.RESULTSPalmitate tracer storage (dpm/g adipose lipid) and calculated palmitate storage rates were greater in omental than abdominal subcutaneous fat in women (1.2 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 μmol ⋅ kg adipose lipid−1 ⋅ min−1, P = 0.005) and men (0.7 ± 0.2 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1, P < 0.001), and both were greater in women than men (P < 0.0001). Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue palmitate storage rates correlated with ACS activity (women: r = 0.66, P = 0.001; men: r = 0.70, P = 0.007); in men, CD36 was also independently related to palmitate storage rates. The content/activity of FA storage enzymes/proteins in omental fat was dramatically lower in those with more visceral fat. In women, only omental palmitate storage rates were correlated (r = 0.54, P = 0.03) with ACS activity.CONCLUSIONSSome adipocyte FA storage factors correlate with direct FFA storage, but sex differences in this process in visceral fat do not account for sex differences in visceral fatness. The reduced storage proteins in those with greater visceral fat suggest that the storage factors we measured are not a predominant cause of visceral adipose tissue accumulation.
Metformin is known to improve insulin sensitivity in part via a rise in AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity and alterations in muscle metabolism. However, a full understanding of how metformin alters AMPK-α(1) vs. AMPK-α(2) activation remains unknown. To study this question, L6 skeletal muscle cells were treated with or without RNAi oligonucleotide sequences to downregulate AMPK-α(1) or AMPK-α(2) protein expression and incubated with or without 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside (AICAR) or metformin and/or insulin. In contrast to AICAR, which preferentially activated AMPK-α(2), metformin preferentially activated AMPK-α(1) in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Metformin increased (P < 0.05) glucose uptake and plasma membrane (PM) Glut4 in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Metformin significantly reduced palmitate uptake (P < 0.05) and oxidation (P < 0.05), and this was accompanied by a similar decrease (P < 0.05) in PM CD36 content but with no change in acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) phosphorylation (P > 0.05). AICAR and metformin similarly increased (P < 0.05) nuclear silent mating-type information regulator 2 homolog 1 (SIRT1) activity. Downregulation of AMPK-α(1) completely prevented the metformin-induced reduction in palmitate uptake and oxidation but only partially reduced the metformin-induced increase in glucose uptake. Downregulation of AMPK-α(2) had no effect on metformin-induced glucose uptake, palmitate uptake, and oxidation. The increase in SIRT1 activity induced by metformin was not affected by downregulation of either AMPK-α(1) or AMPK-α(2). Our data indicate that, in muscle cells, the inhibitory effects of metformin on fatty acid metabolism occur via preferential phosphorylation of AMPK-α(1), and the data indicate that cross talk between AMPK and SIRT1 does not favor either AMPK isozyme.
Defective glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia after islet transplantation has been reported in animals and humans with type 1 diabetes. To ascertain whether this is true of islets from non-diabetic humans, subjects with autoislet transplantation in the intrahepatic site only (TP/IAT-H) or in intrahepatic plus non-hepatic (TP/IAT-H+NH) sites were studied. Glucagon responses were examined during stepped hypoglycemic clamps. Glucagon and symptom responses during hypoglycemia were virtually absent in subjects who received islets in the hepatic site only (glucagon increment over baseline = 1 +/− 6, pg/ml, mean +/− SE, n = 9, p = ns; symptom score = 1 +/− 1, p=ns). When islets were transplanted in both intrahepatic + non-hepatic sites, glucagon and symptom responses were not significantly different than Control Subjects (TP/IAT-H+NH: glucagon increment = 54 +/− 14, n = 5; symptom score = 7 +/− 3; Control glucagon increment = 67 +/− 15, n = 5; symptom score = 8 +/− 1). In contrast, glucagon responses to intravenous arginine were present in TP/IAT-H recipients (TP/IAT: glucagon response = 37 +/− 8, n=7).). Transplantation of a portion of the islets into a non-hepatic site should be seriously considered in TP/IAT to avoid post-transplant abnormalities in glucagon and symptom responses to hypoglycemia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.