No abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To identify patterns of therapy failure after radiotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective study was conducted at a Chinese hospital from June 2012 to July 2018. All analyses were done using SPSS 26. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 105 patients with treatment failure were included. After a median follow-up of 27 months (range 10–82), the 3-year survival rate after therapy failure was 19.4%. In multivariate analysis, squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) &#x3c;4 ng/mL (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and disease-free interval &#x3e;12 months (<i>p</i> = 0.013) showed significant survival benefits. We identified 3 types of failure: distant lymph node metastasis (<i>n</i> = 50), hematogenous metastasis (<i>n</i> = 53) and pelvic failure (<i>n</i> = 48). Most metastatic para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) were inferior to the level of left renal hilum (84.8%, <i>n</i> = 28). A total of 80% of patients with supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLN) metastasis ignored imaging on supraclavicular region. For solitary SCLN or lung metastasis, the prognosis was better than that combined with other sites failure, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.005; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Many patients with central sites recurrence received insufficient doses of intracavitary brachytherapy (IBT) for low tolerance to pain. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The distribution of metastatic PALN is asymmetrical and optimizing clinical target volume to minimize toxicity of para-aortic radiation is necessary. The effect of ultrasonography as preliminary screening and follow-up means on SCLN metastasis can be expected. Pain management and psychological interventions are essential for patients receiving IBT.

6031 Background: Standard treatment nowadays for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). However, due to distant metastasis, survival outcomes are still not optimistic. We tried to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LACC after treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). Methods: Patients diagnosed between May, 2013 to May, 2018 with stage IIA-IIIB LACC were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients received platinum-based radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy and were divided into two groups: adjuvant chemotherapy after CCRT (CCRT+ACT group) and observation after CCRT (CCRT group). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and adverse effects were recorded and analyzed. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to calculate and compare differences between survival outcomes. Toxicities were analyzed using chi-square test. Results: In total, 375 patients were included in this study, and 262 patients accepted ACT after CCRT while the remaining 113 patients chose to observe. With a median follow-up of 40 months (range 5-73 months), no significant differences were found in both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) between two groups referring as 88.5% vs. 90.3% ( P= 0.904) and 83.2% vs. 87.6% ( P= 0.374). OS rates for patients in CCRT+ACT and CCRT groups at 1 year and 3 years were 97.3% vs. 94.7% ( P= 0.195) and 90.2% vs. 88.4% ( P= 0.694), respectively. Meanwhile, PFS rates at 1 year and 3 years were 92% vs. 94.7% ( P= 0.371) and 87.5% vs. 85.5% ( P= 0.761) for two arms separately. 3-4 grades acute adverse events happened more frequently in CCRT+ACT group than in CCRT group, with significant differences in neutropenia and anemia ( P <0.05). Conclusions: In this study, adjuvant chemotherapy after concomitant chemoradiotherapy did not show benefit of survival but do induce adverse effects. We do not suggest it unless further large scale randomized controlled trials are executed to verify it.

BackgroundThis study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict the survival for stage IIIC endometrial cancer (EC) patients with adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) alone and personalize recommendations for the following adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).MethodsIn total, 746 stage IIIC EC patients with ART alone were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram was developed accordingly, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and C-index were implemented to assess the predictive power. The patients were divided into different risk strata based on the total points derived from the nomogram, and survival probability was compared between each risk stratus and another SEER-based cohort of stage IIIC EC patients receiving ART+ACT (cohort ART+ACT).ResultsFive independent predictors were included in the model, which had favorable discriminative power both in the training (C-index: 0.732; 95% CI: 0.704–0.760) and validation cohorts (C-index: 0.731; 95% CI: 0.709–0.753). The patients were divided into three risk strata (low risk &lt;135, 135 ≤ middle risk ≤205, and high risk &gt;205), where low-risk patients had survival advantages over patients from cohort ART+ACT (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33–0.61, P &lt; 0.001). However, the middle- and high-risk patients were inferior to patients from cohort ART+ACT in survival (P &lt; 0.001).ConclusionA nomogram was developed to exclusively predict the survival for stage IIIC EC patients with ART alone, based on which the low-risk patients might be perfect candidates to omit the following ACT. However, the middle- and high-risk patients would benefit from the following ACT.

Objectives: With the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), survival outcomes are still not optimal. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with LACC after treatment with CCRT. Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage IIA-IIIB LACC, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received cisplatin-based CCRT and were divided into two groups: ACT after CCRT (CCRT + ACT group) and observation after CCRT (CCRT group). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effects were recorded and analyzed. Results: In total, 375 patients were included; 262 patients accepted ACT after CCRT while the remaining 113 patients chose observation. With a median follow-up of 40 months, no significant differences were found in the OS rates for patients in the CCRT + ACT and CCRT groups at 1 year, 3 years and the end of follow-up. There was also no significant discrepancy in PFS between groups. Subgroup analysis showed the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and age had negligible influence on both OS and PFS. Acute adverse events (grades 3–4) happened more frequently in CCRT + ACT group than in the CCRT group, with significant differences in neutropenia, anemia and creatinine. Conclusion: ACT after CCRT did not show benefit in survival but did induce some adverse effects. Therefore, this regimen is not recommended unless further large-scale randomized controlled trials are executed.