The effects of reaction conditions on the yield of ethylene and propylene from pentene cracking were investigated in a fixed-bed reactor at 500–750 °C and for a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 15–83 h−1. The total yield of ethylene and propylene reached a maximum (67.8 wt%) at 700 °C and 57 h−1. In order to explore the reaction mechanism at high temperatures, a thermal/catalytic cracking proportion model was established. It was found that the proportion of pentene feed chemically adsorbed with the acid sites and cracked through catalytic cracking was above 88.4%, even at 750 °C. Ethylene and propylene in the products were mainly derived from catalytic cracking rather than thermal cracking at 650–750 °C. In addition, the suitable reaction network for pentene catalytic cracking was deduced and estimated. The results showed that the monomolecular cracking proportion increased from 1% at 500 °C to 95% at 750 °C. The high selectivity of ethylene and propylene at high temperatures was mainly due to the intensification of the monomolecular cracking reaction. After 20 times of regeneration, the acidity and pore structure of the zeolite had hardly changed, and the conversion of pentene remained above 80% at 650 °C.
The effect of reaction temperature and weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) on the reaction of 1-decene cracking to ethylene and propylene over H-ZSM-5 zeolite was investigated. Also, the thermal cracking reaction of 1-decene was studied by cracking over quartz sand as blank. It was observed that 1-decene undergoes a significant thermal cracking reaction above 600 °C over quartz sand. In the range of 500−750 °C, the conversion remained above 99% for 1-decene cracking over H-ZSM-5, and the catalytic cracking dominated even at 750 °C. With the increase in temperature, the yields of ethylene and propylene gradually increased, and the yields of alkanes and aromatics also increased. The low WHSV was favorable for the yield of light olefins. With the increase of the WHSV, the yields of ethylene and propylene decrease. However, at low WHSV, secondary reactions were accelerated, and the yields of alkanes and aromatics increased significantly. In addition, the possible main and side reaction routes of the 1-decene cracking reaction were proposed based on product distribution.
The effect of the molecular structure of feedstock on the cracking reaction of C10 hydrocarbons to ethylene and propylene over H-ZSM-5 zeolite was investigated. To better compare the effect of decane on the production of light olefins, the thermal cracking and catalytic cracking performance of decane were first investigated. As a comparison, the thermal cracking and catalytic cracking of decane were studied by cracking over quartz sand and H-ZSM-5. Compared with the thermal cracking reaction over quartz sand, the catalytic cracking reaction of decane over H-ZSM-5 has a significantly higher conversion and light olefins selectivity, especially when the reaction temperature was lower than 600 °C. On this basis, the catalytic cracking reactions of decane and decene over H-ZSM-5 were further compared. It was found that decene with a double bond structure had high reactivity over H-ZSM-5 and was almost completely converted, and the product was mainly olefin. Compared with decane as feedstock, it has a lower methane yield and higher selectivity of light olefins. Therefore, decene was more suitable for the production of light olefins than decane. To this end, we designed a new light olefin production process. Through olefin cracking, the yield of light olefins in the product can be effectively improved, and the proportion of different light olefins such as ethylene, propylene and butene can be flexibly adjusted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.