ObjectivesCorticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment for rheumatic diseases but can cause hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with resolved HBV infection. Risk assessment and stratification are needed to guide the management of these patients before corticosteroid therapy.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled patients with negative hepatitis B surface antigen positive Anti-hepatitis B core status with or without corticosteroid use and determined corticosteroid exposure by calculating cumulative dose and time-weighted average daily dose of prednisone. The primary outcome was the time to a composite of HBV reactivation, hepatitis flare or severe hepatitis.ResultsAmong 1303 participants, the median of cumulative dose and time-weighted average dose of prednisone used in this cohort was 3000 mg (IQR: 300–6750 mg) and 15 mg/day (IQR: 10–20 mg/day), respectively. In multivariable analyses, cumulative dose showed inverted V-shaped relationship with primary events, which peaked at a cumulative dose of 1506 mg (HR: 3.72; 95% CI, 1.96 to 7.08). Quartiles of time-weighted average dose were independently associated with a monotonic increase in event risk (HR per quartile increase: 2.15; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.98), reaching an HR of 49.48 (95% CI, 6.24 to 392.48) in the top quartile. The incidence of primary outcome was 16.67 per 100 person-years in the top quartile of time-weighted average dose (Q4>20 mg/day). Other quartiles all had an incidence of primary outcome less than 10 per 100 person-years.ConclusionPatients with time-weighted average prednisone dose greater than 20 mg/day would be classified as the high risk for HBV reactivation or hepatitis flare. Prophylactic Anti-HBV therapy may be needed for these high-risk patients.Trial registration numberChiCTR1900023955.

No abstract

ImportanceImproper host response to COVID-19 vaccines could trigger immune-mediated adverse events. The question remains whether COVID-19 vaccination should be postponed until complete remission in patients with uveitis, a preexisting immune-related condition.ObjectiveTo compare recommendations for early and deferred COVID-19 vaccination with respect to uveitis outcomes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis open-label, randomized clinical trial at a large, specialized teaching center for uveitis care in China enrolled unvaccinated patients with inactive uveitis between August 10, 2021, and February 22, 2022, with follow-up to June 6, 2022.InterventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to receive recommendation for early or deferred COVID-19 vaccination after complete remission of uveitis. Non–messenger RNA (non-mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines were available in China during the trial.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the time to symptomatic uveitis worsening during 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included uveitis activity and best-corrected visual acuity at 3 months.ResultsOf the 543 participants (304 women [56.0%]; median age, 35 [IQR, 26-49] years), 262 were recommended for early vaccination and 281 for deferred vaccination. By month 3, 109 patients (41.6%) in the early group had been vaccinated compared with 14 (5.0%) in the deferred recommendation group. In the intention-to-treat population, the time to symptomatic uveitis worsening was shorter in the early group than in the deferred group (hazard ratio, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.09-2.59]; P = .01 by log-rank test). Changes in anterior chamber cells, vitreous haze, and best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to month 3 appeared similar in the 2 groups in the evaluable population after the month 3 in-person visit.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial of patients with inactive uveitis, recommendation for early non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination resulted in a higher incidence of self-reported symptomatic uveitis worsening with possible reporting bias compared with recommendation for deferred vaccination, but no adverse effects were observed in disease and visual prognosis at 3 months. These findings would be useful to guide the individual timing choices of non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in this clinically vulnerable population.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2100049467

Biologics are increasingly used to treat Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, but head-to-head comparisons with conventional immunosuppressants are lacking. Here in this randomized trial (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100043061), we assigned 110 patients (27 early-phase and 83 late-phase) to cyclosporine-based immunosuppressant strategy (N = 56) or adalimumab-based biologic strategy (N = 54), each combined with a modified corticosteroid regimen. The primary outcome is change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 26. The margin of non-inferiority for cyclosporine is −7 letters. The primary outcome is 11.2 letters (95% CI, 7.5 to 14.9) in the cyclosporine group and 6.3 letters (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.6) in the adalimumab group (difference, 4.9; 95% CI, 0.2 to 9.5; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). The between-group difference is −0.8 letters (95% CI, −6.1 to 4.5) in early-phase disease and 5.7 letters (95% CI, 0.2 to 11.2) in late-phase. Serious adverse events are reported less frequently in the cyclosporine group than in the adalimumab group (0.70 vs. 1.21 events per patient-year). Here, we report that combined with a non-standard corticosteroid regimen, cyclosporine-based immunosuppressant strategy is non-inferior to adalimumab-based biologic strategy by 26 weeks for visual improvement in a cohort of patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease, 75% of whom have a late-phase disease.