Background We reviewed 3 different types of tuberculous sacroiliitis via anterior and posterior approaches to determine the efficacy and safety of this surgical approach by describing clinical presentation, imaging, and surgical treatment. Methods We reviewed 33 patients with 3 different types of severe tuberculous sacroiliitis, of which 16 patients with anterior iliac abscess underwent anterior debridement. 17 patients underwent posterior debridement. Among them, 5 patients with lumbar tuberculosis underwent lesion debridement through fenestration, joint fusion, and interbody fusion and internal fixation. The mean postoperative follow-up was 16.9 months (12–25 months).Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to judge the postoperative condition and functional recovery. Results All patients’ hip, back and lower back pain symptoms were significantly relieved after surgical treatment. At 3 months after operation, the VAS and ODI scores of all patients decreased significantly. Conclusion Surgical treatment of tuberculous sacroiliitis should be performed as soon as possible under the adjuvant chemotherapy of anti-tuberculosis drugs. According to the different characteristics of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis, appropriate surgical operations should be adopted according to our classification criteria.
Background Sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis is a relatively rare site of tuberculosis infection, but it can lead to severe sacroiliac joint destruction and dysfunction. Since there are few studies on the surgical methods of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis (SJT), we adopted three different surgical methods based on different degrees of destruction of sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis. While revealing its clinical symptoms to improve the diagnostic accuracy, and to determine the safety and feasibility of this surgical approach in the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 17 patients with tuberculous arthritis of the sacroiliac joint treated by anterior debridement. All these patients underwent anterior debridement of tuberculosis with or without bone graft fusion. Mean postoperative follow-up was 17.2 months (12–25 months). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was used to judge the general situation after surgery, and the fusion of sacroiliac joints was observed by X-ray films and CT scans. And VAS and ODI were used to score to observe postoperative functional recovery. Results Anterior approach debridement is an effective surgical approach for sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis. All patients achieved effective relief of lower back and hip pain. The pain was significantly relieved 3 months after the operation, and the pain basically disappeared 6 months after the operation. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was also significantly reduced after the operation, and it can basically return to the normal level 3 months after the operation. The VAS score and ODI index of the other 16 patients after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery, except for 1 patient who died of severe type I respiratory failure and septic shock 3 months after surgery, The surviving patients were basically able to achieve stable fusion of the sacroiliac joint at 12 months postoperatively. None of the patients reported significant pain until the last follow-up visit. Conclusions The anterior approach is a very effective surgical method for the treatment of sacroiliac joint tuberculous arthritis, and it is safe and feasible. A clear operative field of view facilitates complete debridement and reduces recurrence, and its function recovers well with stable arthrodesis.
Background: Tuberculous sacroiliac joints are relatively rare. Due to the insidious onset and easy misdiagnosis, they often develop into later severe joint destruction without effective treatment in the early stage. There are few existing studies on tuberculous sacroiliitis. In our study, we reviewed 3 different types of tuberculous sacroiliitis via anterior and posterior approaches to determine the efficacy and safety of this surgical approach by describing clinical presentation, imaging, and surgical treatment.Methods: We reviewed 33 patients with 3 different types of severe tuberculous sacroiliitis, of which 16 patients with anterior iliac abscess underwent anterior debridement and bone graft fusion. 17 patients underwent posterior debridement and bone graft fusion. Among them, 5 patients with lumbar tuberculosis underwent lesion debridement through fenestration, joint fusion, and interbody fusion and internal fixation. One patient with anterior paravertebral abscess underwent lesion debridement through posterior fenestration and bone graft fusion in the first operation, and the anterior abscess was removed and intervertebral fusion in the second operation. The mean postoperative follow-up was 16.9 months (12-25 months).Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to judge the postoperative condition and functional recovery. X-ray and CT scan were used to evaluate the fusion of sacroiliac joints.Results: All patients' hip, back and lower back pain symptoms were significantly relieved after surgical treatment. At 3 months after operation, the VAS and ODI scores of all patients decreased significantly. At 12 months after operation, the patients had no obvious pain or only slight discomfort during activities, and the lower limb function basically recovered, which could meet the needs of daily work and life.All cases had sacroiliac joint fusion within 12 months after operation.Conclusion: Tuberculous sacroiliitis is easy to be misdiagnosed due to its insidious onset.Therefore, patients with hip, groin and lower back pain must be carefully checked to avoid misdiagnosis.Surgical treatment should be performed as soon as possible under the adjuvant chemotherapy of anti-tuberculosis drugs. According to the different characteristics of sacroiliac joint tuberculosis, appropriate surgical operations should be adopted according to our classification criteria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.