Background: This study aimed to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of fibrinogen to prealbumin ratio (FPR) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) as single markers or in combination in patients with alpha-fetoprotein-negative (AFP-negative) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A total of 199 healthy controls and 515 AFP-negative patients were enrolled in this study, including 180 HCC inpatients, 151 liver cirrhosis (LC) patients, and 184 chronic hepatitis (CH) cases. Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyze differences between groups in laboratory parameters and clinicopathological features. The diagnostic value of FPR and GPR, alone or in combination, in AFP-negative HCC (AFP-NHCC) patients was determined via a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The levels of FPR and GPR were gradually increased in the development of AFP-NHCC and positively correlated with the tumor size and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. Moreover, GPR was associated with Edmondson-Steiner grades. After univariate logistic regression analysis, FPR and GPR remained independent predictors of adverse outcomes. The combination of FPR and GPR had a good ability to detect AFP-NHCC from the control group (area under curve [AUC] = 0.977), AFP-negative CH (AUC = 0.745), and AFP-negative LC (AUC = 0.666). FPR combined with GPR possessed a larger area (0.943, 0.971) and sensitivity (87.50%, 89.81%) than FPR or GPR alone for differentiating AFP-NHCC with tumor size < 3 cm or at the BCLC-A stage. Conclusions: The pretreatment levels of FPR and GPR played vital roles in the development of AFP-NHCC, especially in patients with early or small AFP-NHCC.

Background. Combination of multiple biomarkers was an effective strategy to improve sensitivity in cancer diagnosis and screening. However, the performance of the combination of methylated SEPT9 and SDC2 for detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) has yet to be reported. Methods. A new qPCR-based assay combining the detection of methylated SEPT9 and SDC2 was used. Methylation statuses of SEPT9 and SDC2 were examined in 19 sets of cancer tissues and paired adjacent tissues and further evaluated with 225 serum samples, including 111 CRC patients and 114 no evidence of disease individuals. Results. SEPT9 and SDC2 methylation levels were higher in 94.7% and 100.0% of cancer tissues than in their paired adjacent tissues. The sensitivities for detecting CRC by SEPT9 methylation alone and SDC2 methylation alone were 73.0% (95% CI: 63.6–80.8%) and 71.2% (95% CI: 61.8–79.2%), respectively, with the same specificity of 95.6% (95% CI: 89.6–98.4%). However, when SEPT9 methylation was combined with SDC2 methylation to detect CRC, the sensitivity was improved to 86.5% (95% CI: 78.4–92.0%) with a specificity of 92.1% (95% CI: 85.1–96.1%). Conclusion. The combination of methylated SEPT9 and SDC2 detection in serum has the potential to be a noninvasive strategy for CRC screening.

Background: Albumin to fibrinogen ratio (AFR) play a crucial role in the progression and prognosis of many malignant tumors. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of AFR as single markers or in combination with squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) in cervical cancer. Methods: A total of 323 cervical cancer inpatients, 143 patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and 317 healthy controls were analyzed. Differences in laboratory parameters and clinicopathological features were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis H test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predicted value of AFR, alone or combined with SCC-Ag, CA-125 for the diagnosis of cervical cancer. Results: The levels of AFR in patients with cervical cancer were significantly lower than those in the CIN patients and the control subjects. AFR were not only negatively correlated with the tumor stage, but also related to histology typing, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, depth of stromal infiltration, tumor size, and tumor stage; however, it was not associated with the blood group. AFR combined with SCC-Ag possessed a larger area under the curve (AUC; AUCAFR+SCC-Ag = 0.924, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.900, 0.944) than AFR ( P < 0.001), SCC-Ag ( P < 0.001), or CA-125 ( P < 0.001) did alone. Conclusions: The pretreatment levels of AFR, alone or combined with SCC-Ag, CA-125 could improve the diagnostic efficiency of cervical cancer.