Background Previous studies have linked high myopia (HM) to brain activity, and the difference between HM and low myopia (LM) can be assessed. Purpose To study the differences in functional networks of brain activity between HM and LM by the voxel-level degree centrality (DC) method. Material and Methods Twenty-eight patients with HM (10 men, 18 women), 18 patients with LM (4 men, 14 women), and 59 healthy controls (27 men, 32 women) were enrolled in this study. The voxel-level DC method was used to assess spontaneous brain activity. Correlation analysis was used to explore the change of average DC value in different brain regions, in order to analyze differences in brain activity between HM and LM. Results DC values of the right cerebellum anterior lobe/brainstem, right parahippocampal gyrus, and left caudate in HM patients were significantly higher than those in LM patients ( P < 0.05). In contrast, DC values of the left medial frontal gyrus, right inferior frontal gyrus, left middle frontal gyrus, and left inferior parietal lobule were significantly lower in patients with HM ( P < 0.05). However, there was no correlation between behavior and average DC values in different brain regions ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Different changes in brain regions between HM and LM may indicate differences in neural mechanisms between HM and LM. DC values could be useful as biomarkers for differences in brain activity between patients with HM and LM. This study provides a new method to assess differences in functional networks of brain activity between patients with HM and LM.
The mutation frequency of IMPDH1 gene of the Han population in Ganzhou city was similar as approximately 2-5% of the adRP cases among Americans of European origin and Europeans.
Background. The diversification of follow-up ophthalmic imaging examination methods, and whether there are differences in clinical characteristics of VKH at the acute stage under different images. Our study aims to compare the imaging characteristics of the acute phase of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) under different fundus imaging methods to deepen clinical knowledge. Methods. A retrospective case study was performed on fundus images of 62 eyes from 31 patients with acute phase VKH and a disease duration ≤2 months who were treated at Ganzhou People’s Hospital from January 2013 to December 2020. Fundus photography (FP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) were performed on all 62 eyes. The fundus presentations were divided into an optic disc swelling (ODS) group, a serous retinal detachment (SRD) group, and a mixed type (MT) group (both ODS and SRD), and the proportions of patients in these groups and the coincidence rate of ODS, SRD, and MT identified by the three fundus imaging modes were determined. Results. The proportion of patients with ODS was highest under FP, and the proportion of patients with MT was highest under OCT. The proportions of patients with ODS and MT in the three fundus imaging modes differed significantly ( P < 0.05 ), while the proportion of patients with SRD did not ( P > 0.05 ). The proportion of patients with subretinal fluid with positive OCT results was significantly higher than those with positive FFA results (81.08% vs. 59.46%) ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion. Clinically significant positive signs could be obtained for acute VKH under different imaging methods. However, compared with FP and FFA, OCT tomography is more intuitive for the observation of lesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.