We sought evidence of hypercoagulability in 59 seriously injured trauma patients. An extended coagulation profile (consisting of tissue plasminogen activator antigen concentration, plasminogen activator inhibitor, serum antithrombin III, protein C antigen, functional protein C, protein S antigen, D-dimer, and prothrombin fragment 1.2) was compared to control values. Laboratory evidence of hypercoagulability was seen in 85% (n = 50) of the patients. Patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 (n = 36) had significantly elevated levels of D-dimer and decreased levels of functional protein C compared to patients with an ISS < or = 15 (n = 23). Functional protein C had a negative correlation (r = -0.44; p < 0.001) with the ISS. A hypercoagulable state exists immediately following severe trauma. Greater injury severity may increase this hypercoagulable state. Decreased levels of functional protein C best correlated with increased injury severity.

Caring for a family member with dementia is associated with unique stressors and burdens related to caregiving. Delivering interventions with proven efficacy to dementia caregivers remains a challenge because of the complexity of providing psychosocial support and skills training for caregivers within current models of formal healthcare services. This article focuses on implementation research and presents a dementia caregiver model program that merges an evidence-based intervention with a proven volunteer program, resulting in the implementation research program called Support Teams for Caregivers. In this article, we delineate our implementation model, describe the program, and present a case study.

ObjectiveHospitalized patients placed in isolation due to a carrier state or infection with resistant or highly communicable organisms report higher rates of anxiety and loneliness and have fewer physician encounters, room entries, and vital sign records. We hypothesized that isolation status might adversely impact patient experience as reported through Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys, particularly regarding communication.DesignRetrospective analysis of HCAHPS survey results over 5 years.SettingA 1,165-bed, tertiary-care, academic medical center.PatientsPatients on any type of isolation for at least 50% of their stay were the exposure group. Those never in isolation served as controls.MethodsMultivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, race, gender, payer, severity of illness, length of stay and clinical service were used to examine associations between isolation status and “top-box” experience scores. Dose response to increasing percentage of days in isolation was also analyzed.ResultsPatients in isolation reported worse experience, primarily with staff responsiveness (help toileting 63% vs 51%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.77; P = .0009) and overall care (rate hospital 80% vs 73%; aOR, 0.78; P < .0001), but they reported similar experience in other domains. No dose-response effect was observed.ConclusionIsolated patients do not report adverse experience for most aspects of provider communication regarded to be among the most important elements for safety and quality of care. However, patients in isolation had worse experiences with staff responsiveness for time-sensitive needs. The absence of a dose-response effect suggests that isolation status may be a marker for other factors, such as illness severity. Regardless, hospitals should emphasize timely staff response for this population.

CUSP teams improved patient experience. The teams could expand their scope to be the unit-level resource focused not only on safety but also on external quality measures to which patient experience is a broad category for HCAHPS scores, and potentially on value in future work.