The implementation of a patient navigator program improved breast cancer care as measured by BCCQI. The impact on disease-free and overall survival remains to be determined.

Sepsis in rats decreases the hepatic expression of the gluconeogenic enzyme glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship among G6Pase transcription, mRNA, enzymatic activity, and serum glucose levels at different intervals during mild or fulminant sepsis. Both fulminant and mild sepsis immediately decreased hepatic G6Pase mRNA levels. In mild sepsis, levels began to recover late in the time course. Serum glucose levels were maintained in mild sepsis but decreased markedly in fulminant sepsis. G6Pase transcription after fulminant sepsis decreased and never recovered. A similar transcriptional decrease was noted in mild sepsis, but some recovery occurred in this state. Histochemistry after mild sepsis revealed a decrease in G6Pase protein and enzymatic activity that paralleled transcription. These studies suggest that changes in G6Pase transcription and activity are early markers for sepsis-induced alterations in hepatic function. Mechanisms other than gene expression and enzymatic activity serve to maintain glucose levels in mild sepsis, but in the fulminant disorder, compensatory mechanisms fail and hypoglycemia develops.

Sepsis is the leading cause of death in surgical intensive care units. Although both mild sepsis secondary to cecal ligation and single puncture (CLP) and fulminant, double puncture CLP (2CLP) may provoke hepatocyte death, we hypothesize that regeneration compensates for cell death after CLP but not 2CLP. In male Sprague-Dawley rats, hepatic necrosis, as determined by serum alpha-glutathione S-transferase (alpha-GST) levels, was significantly but equally elevated over time after both CLP and 2CLP. Apoptosis, evaluated using both terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and morphological examination, was minimal after both CLP and 2CLP. Regeneration, assayed by staining tissue for incorporation of exogenously administered bromodeoxyuridine, was present after CLP but not after 2CLP. To further substantiate impaired regeneration, steady-state levels of mRNAs encoding JunB, LRF-1, and cyclin D1 were determined. After 2CLP, the absence of JunB, LRF-1, and cyclin D1 mRNAs confirmed failed activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase-linked proliferative pathway and progression through the cell cycle. Therefore, failed hepatocyte regeneration may be a manifestation of hepatic dysfunction in fulminant sepsis.

Key words: Evisceration of small intestine; Vaginal evisceration; Vaginal rupture; Rectal prolapse; Enterocele; Proctectomy] O'Brien LM, Bellin LS, Isenberg GA, Goldstein SD. Spontaneous transvaginal small-bowel evisceration after perineal proctectomy: report of a case and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether it is appropriate to transfer the follow-up care of breast cancer (BrCa) survivors from cancer specialists to primary care physicians (PCPs). This contemporary study compared physician specialty and documented the long-term surveillance of survivors who underwent surgery at an American academic center. METHODS: Women in this institutional review board-approved study underwent breast surgery between 1996 and 2006. Data were collected for 270 patients with stage I to III BrCa (mean follow-up, 6 years). Charts were reviewed based on American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for recommended surveillance frequency and care. RESULTS: The majority of patients (90%; n ¼ 242) were followed by specialists with 10% (n ¼ 28) followed by PCPs. Patients with advanced disease and a greater risk of disease recurrence more often received specialist care. Patients followed by specialists were more often seen at ASCO-recommended intervals (eg, 89% vs 69% of patients followed by a PCP at follow-up Year 6; P < .01); however, many patients were followed inconsistently. Breast disease was often not the focus of PCP visits or mentioned in clinic notes (18% patients). Women seen by specialists were more likely to have documented clinical examinations of the breast (93% vs 44% at Year 6), axilla (94% vs 52%), or annual mammograms (74% vs 48%; P ¼ .001-.02). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent compliance with surveillance guidelines and chart documentation needs improvement among all providers; however, specialists more consistently met ASCO guidelines. If transfer of care to a PCP occurs, it should be formalized and include follow-up recommendations and defined physician responsibilities. Providers and patients should be educated regarding surveillance care and current guidelines incorporated into standard clinical practice.