No abstract

With the rise in affordability of digital media and mobile devices, children under age 2 on average spend significantly more time with digital media than is recommended.Although concerns have been expressed about how parent and child media use might negatively impact parent-child attachment, there continues to be a scarcity of research on the topic. The current study assessed both the amount and the way in which children (11-26 months) and their parents engage with digital media and the impact on early attachment after controlling for temperament, parent income, parent age, marital status, and access to support. The study utilizes data from a diverse sample: 248 parents of infants completed an attachment q-sort and surveys assessing the amount of media use, parental absorption in media, types of parental mediation, temperament, and demographics.Results showed that for both parent and child, time using digital media and co-viewing was not predictive of attachment insecurity. Parental absorption in media was found to significantly predict attachment insecurity. Greater child TV media use was associated with poorer attachment security when there was limited to no parental active mediation.Active mediation served as a protective factor for attachment while parental absorption in media serves as a risk factor for attachment. |LINDER Et aL. | INTRODUCTIONDue to the accessibility and affordability of digital media devices, media use and device ownership have increased dramatically in the last ten years. Depending on the study, children under age 2 spend between 40 min and 3 hours a day engaged with screens (

It is estimated that between 10% and 21% of preschool children exhibit challenging behavior (Snell et al., 2012). Children identified as having aggressive behavior in preschool are more likely to experience continuing behavior problems throughout elementary school and into adoles

No abstract

Research suggests that toddlers with regulation issues engage in significantly more media use than toddlers without regulation difficulties, and this may be due, in part, to parental strain associated with parenting a child who is difficult to regulate or soothe. The current study sought to determine if the observed relationship between parental strain and child media use in the context of regulation difficulties continues into the preschool years. Data from the 2016 (N = 6,976) and 2017 (N = 3,056) National Survey of Children's Health were used to test a structural equation model (SEM) examining the moderating effect of parenting strain on the relationship between child media use and child regulation after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES) and adverse childhood experiences. The SEM had reasonable model fit. The study did not find a moderating effect for parenting strain but did identify a small significant relationship between child media use and regulation after controlling for parenting strain and SES. Additionally, SES proved to be a strong moderator of regulation and child media use. These findings point to the possibility that the relationship between parental strain and child media use may be more directly related to perceived ability to calm their child identified in previous research rather than perception of child's difficulty. This study demonstrated that the negative link between child media use and regulation may persist into the preschool years. Limitations of the study include broad items used to assess time spent with media and limited depth of questions associated with regulation and parenting strain.